70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dyslipidemia is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. The characteristic features of diabetic dyslipidemia are a high plasma triglyceride concentration, low HDL cholesterol concentration and increased concentration of small dense LDL-cholesterol particles. The lipid changes associated with diabetes mellitus are attributed to increased free fatty acid flux secondary to insulin resistance. The availability of multiple lipid-lowering drugs and supplements provides new opportunities for patients to achieve target lipid levels. However, the variety of therapeutic options poses a challenge in the prioritization of drug therapy. The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia is not increased in patients with diabetes mellitus, but mortality from coronary heart disease increases exponentially as a function of serum cholesterol levels, and lowering of cholesterol with statins reduces diabetic patients' relative cardiovascular risk. Although drug therapy for dyslipidemia must be individualized, most people with diabetes mellitus are candidates for statin therapy, and often need treatment with multiple agents to achieve therapeutic goals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 27. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins at diagnosis of NIDDM by age and sex.

          To compare fasting plasma lipids and lipoproteins in male and female patients at diagnosis of NIDDM and to examine age and sex differences in lipid concentrations. Cross-sectional study of fasting plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride in 2,139 male and 1,574 female white patients, aged 25-65 years, at diagnosis of NIDDM. At diagnosis of NIDDM, the mean age +/- SD for men was 52 +/- 9 and 53 +/- 9 years for women; BMI was 28.3 +/- 4.9 and 30.8 +/- 6.7 kg/m2, and fasting plasma glucose was 11.6 +/- 3.6 and 12.4 +/- 3.8 mmol/l, respectively. The mean total and LDL cholesterol were higher in female than in male NIDDM patients, 5.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.1 and 3.9 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.0 mmol/l (both P < 0.001), respectively, while triglyceride levels were similar: geometric mean (1 SD interval) for men and women was 1.8 (1.1-3.1) vs. 1.8 (1.1-2.9) mmol/l. HDL cholesterol was higher in female than in male NIDDM patients, 1.09 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.01 +/- 0.24 mmol/l (P < 0.001); the sex differential for HDL cholesterol was 7% in NIDDM patients compared with 22% in the general population. Data analysis by 5-year age bands showed a significant trend toward lower total cholesterol and triglyceride and higher HDL cholesterol in men diagnosed above the age of 50 years. In female NIDDM patients, lipid concentrations increased with age of diagnosis but reached a plateau above the age of 50 years. The effect of NIDDM, observed at diagnosis, on plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels is more pronounced in women than in men. This may explain in part why the cardiovascular risk is proportionally higher in female patients.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab
            Nature clinical practice. Endocrinology & metabolism
            Springer Science and Business Media LLC
            1745-8374
            1745-8366
            Mar 2009
            : 5
            : 3
            Affiliations
            [1 ] Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA. arshag.mooradian@jax.ufl.edu
            Article
            ncpendmet1066
            10.1038/ncpendmet1066
            19229235
            84208acb-697d-4b81-9f47-70f7e089037c
            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article