20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of health warning labels on selection and consumption of food and alcohol products: systematic review with meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Health warning labels (HWLs) could reduce harmful consumption of food (including non-alcoholic drinks) and alcoholic drinks. A systematic review with meta-analysis using Cochrane methods was conducted to assess the impact on selection (including hypothetical selection) or consumption of food or alcoholic drink products displaying image-and-text (sometimes termed ‘pictorial’) and text-only HWLs. Fourteen randomised controlled trials were included, three for alcohol, eleven for food. For the primary outcomes, eleven studies measured selection and one measured consumption (two measured only other secondary outcomes). Meta-analysis of twelve comparisons from nine studies (n=12,635) found HWLs reduced selection of the targeted product compared with no HWL (RR=0.74 (95%CI 0.68–0.80)), with participants 26% less likely to choose a product displaying a HWL. A planned subgroup analysis suggested a larger (although not statistically significant) effect on selection of image-and-text HWLs (RR=0.65 (95%CI 0.54–0.80)) than text-only HWLs (RR=0.79 (95%CI 0.74–0.85)). These findings suggest significant potential for HWLs to reduce selection of food and alcoholic drinks, but all experimental studies to date were conducted in laboratory or online settings with outcomes assessed immediately after a single exposure. Studies in field and naturalistic laboratory settings are needed to estimate the potential effects of food and alcohol HWLs.

          Study registration : PROSPERO 2018 (registration number: CRD42018106522).

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.

              This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in systematic reviews, health technology assessments (HTAs), and clinical practice guidelines addressing alternative management options. The GRADE process begins with asking an explicit question, including specification of all important outcomes. After the evidence is collected and summarized, GRADE provides explicit criteria for rating the quality of evidence that include study design, risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and magnitude of effect. Recommendations are characterized as strong or weak (alternative terms conditional or discretionary) according to the quality of the supporting evidence and the balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of the alternative management options. GRADE suggests summarizing evidence in succinct, transparent, and informative summary of findings tables that show the quality of evidence and the magnitude of relative and absolute effects for each important outcome and/or as evidence profiles that provide, in addition, detailed information about the reason for the quality of evidence rating. Subsequent articles in this series will address GRADE's approach to formulating questions, assessing quality of evidence, and developing recommendations. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Psychol Rev
                Health Psychol Rev
                Health Psychology Review
                Routledge
                1743-7199
                1743-7202
                2 July 2020
                2021
                2 July 2020
                : 15
                : 3
                : 430-453
                Affiliations
                [a ]Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
                [b ]Psychological Assessment & Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz , Konstanz, Germany
                [c ]Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol , Bristol, UK
                Author notes
                [CONTACT ] Natasha Clarke ncc42@ 123456medschl.cam.ac.uk

                Supplemental data for this article can be accessed https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1780147

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2375-4510
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-2652
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-8842
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3147-5079
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-1818
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-1129
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-3924
                Article
                1780147
                10.1080/17437199.2020.1780147
                8635708
                32515697
                840a3599-1b02-4b02-8966-fd611fcc69ca
                © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 62, Pages: 24
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                health warning labels,sugar sweetened beverages,alcohol,food,systematic review,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content261

                Cited by31

                Most referenced authors1,110