4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      L-form-like colonies of Staphylococcus aureus induced by an extracellular lytic enzyme from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An extracellular enzyme produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa had a lytic effect on lyophilized Staphylococcus aureus cells. It was purified from the culture supernatant by ammonium sulfate fractionation followed by column chromatography with P cellulose and Sephadex G-50. The molecular weight of the enzyme was estimated to be 19,000 +/- 1,750 with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The pI of the enzyme was estimated to be 8.5 with isoelectric focusing. The enzyme was inactive in 4% NaC1-40 mM sodium phosphate buffer or at pH values lower than 6.0 or higher than 11.0; however, it was not affected by 1 M sucrose or 0.25% heat-denatured horse serum. The action of the enzyme on cultures of S. aureus resulted in the presence of many cells lacking cell walls. In addition, when cultivation was carried out on osmotically stabilized solid media, these cell wall-deficient cell developed in L-form colonies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Clin. Microbiol.
          Journal of clinical microbiology
          0095-1137
          0095-1137
          Jul 1989
          : 27
          : 7
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Departamento de Microbiología y Biología Celular, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Island, Spain.
          Article
          10.1128/jcm.27.7.1650-1654.1989
          267632
          2504772
          83f9d353-640b-41c5-bfe6-fa5bc99bc833
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article