12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The association between region of birth and sexually transmitted infections among people of black Caribbean ethnicity attending sexual health services in England, 2015

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Introduction

          In England, people of Black Caribbean (BC) ethnicity are disproportionately affected by sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but it is unclear whether this varies by their region of birth.

          Aim(s)/Objectives

          To examine differences in STI diagnoses among UK- and Caribbean-born BC people.

          Methods

          Data on STI diagnoses in BC people attending specialist sexual health services (SHSs) during 2015 and living in England were obtained from the GUMCAD STI surveillance system, the national surveillance system for STIs in England. Associations between being UK- or Caribbean-born and each of several STI diagnoses were examined, using univariate and multivariable generalised estimated equations logistic regression models adjusted for sexual orientation, place of residence (London vs. non-London), HIV status, area-level deprivation, and STI diagnosis in the last year. All analyses were stratified by age (<25 vs. ≥25 years).

          Results

          In 2015, 63,568 BC people made 108,881 attendances at specialist SHSs; 81.9% of these attendances were made by UK-born BCs. The median age (years) was 26 for UK-born and 35 for Caribbean-born people (p≤0.001). Chlamydia, gonorrhoea and non-specific genital infection (NSGI) were the most commonly diagnosed STIs among UK- (5.8%, 2.1% and 2.8%) and Caribbean-born people (4.5%, 1.7% and 3.5%) respectively. Among BCs aged under 25, no significant differences in STIs were found between UK- and Caribbean-born people. Among BCs aged ≥25, compared to Caribbean-born people, those who were UK-born were more likely to be diagnosed with chlamydia (AOR 1.15 [95%C.I. 1.04–1.27]); gonorrhoea (AOR 1.23 [95%C.I. 1.06–1.45]) and genital herpes (AOR 1.23 [95% C.I. 1.10–1.56]) and less likely to be diagnosed with NSGI (AOR 0.89 [95% C.I. 0.80–0.99]) and Trichomoniasis (AOR 0.84 [95% C.I. 0.71–0.99]).

          Discussion/Conclusion

          STI diagnoses in BC people aged ≥25 attending specialist SHSs vary by region of birth. Country of birth may have an influence on social and sexual networks and therefore transmission of STIs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections.

          Social context (demographic, socioeconomic, macroeconomic, and sociopolitical features of the environment) influences the epidemiology and consequences of individual behaviors that affect health outcomes. This article examines the role of social context in heterosexual networks that facilitate the spread of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), particularly in relation to persistent racial disparities in rates of STIs in the United States. Review of the medical, public health, and social science literature. Contextual factors, such as poverty, discrimination, epidemiology of illicit drug use in the community, ratio of men to women, incarceration rates, and racial segregation, influence sexual behavior and sexual networks directly and indirectly through a variety of mechanisms. Disparities in these contextual features likely contribute substantially to the persistence of marked racial disparities in rates of STIs. Given the importance of contextual factors and the sharply contrasting social contexts for blacks and whites, exclusive emphasis on individual risk factors and determinants is unlikely to produce solutions that will significantly decrease HIV rates among blacks. Effective HIV prevention in this population will require multidisciplinary research to address the contextual factors that promote patterns of sexual networks that facilitate transmission of STIs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

            Studies of the epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections (STI) are largely based on surveillance data. As part of a national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal 2000) in Britain, we estimated the frequency of self-reported STIs, and the prevalence of urinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection. We did a stratified probability sample survey of 11161 men and women aged 16-44 years in Britain. Computer assisted self-interviews contained items on the nature and timing of previously diagnosed STIs. Half of all sexually experienced respondents aged 18-44 years were invited to provide a urine sample for ligase chain reaction testing for C trachomatis infection. 10.8% of men and 12.6% of women reported ever having an STI, 3.6% of men and 4.1% of women reported ever being diagnosed with genital warts, and 1.4% of men and 3.1% of women reported previous infection with C trachomatis. 76% of men and 57% of women ever diagnosed with an STI had been to a GUM clinic. C trachomatis was found in 2.2% (95% CI 1.5-3.2) of men and 1.5% (95% CI 1.11-2.14) of women with age-specific prevalence being highest among men aged 25-34 (3.1%) and women aged 16-24 years (3.0%). Non-married status, age, and reporting partner concurrency or two or more sexual partners in the past year were independently associated with infection with C trachomatis. We show substantial heterogeneity in distribution of reported STIs, and the demographic and behavioural determinants of prevalent genital chlamydial infection. The results have potentially wide application for proposed chlamydia screening programmes which, given the demonstrated prevalence, must now proactively seek to involve men.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Negro, Black, Black African, African Caribbean, African American or what? Labelling African origin populations in the health arena in the 21st century.

              Broad terms such as Black, African, or Black African are entrenched in scientific writings although there is considerable diversity within African descent populations and such terms may be both offensive and inaccurate. This paper outlines the heterogeneity within African populations, and discusses the strengths and limitations of the term Black and related labels from epidemiological and public health perspectives in Europe and the USA. This paper calls for debate on appropriate terminologies for African descent populations and concludes with the proposals that (1) describing the population under consideration is of paramount importance (2) the word African origin or simply African is an appropriate and necessary prefix for an ethnic label, for example, African Caribbean or African Kenyan or African Surinamese (3) documents should define the ethnic labels (4) the label Black should be phased out except when used in political contexts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                21 February 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 2
                : e0228654
                Affiliations
                [1 ] National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Centre for Population Research in Sexual Health and HIV, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ] The Applied Diagnostic Research and Evaluation Unit (ADREU), St George’s, University, City, London, United Kingdom
                [4 ] National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                University of Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-225X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-7702
                Article
                PONE-D-19-20965
                10.1371/journal.pone.0228654
                7034901
                32084155
                83b18228-d994-4643-8043-60839143f506
                © 2020 Harb et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 25 July 2019
                : 21 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008721, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust;
                Award Recipient :
                The research and SW are funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at UCL, http://bbsti.hpru.nihr.ac.uk/, in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england, and in collaboration with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or PHE. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and health sciences
                Diagnostic medicine
                HIV diagnosis and management
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                North America
                Caribbean
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Europe
                European Union
                United Kingdom
                England
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Urology
                Genitourinary Infections
                Trichomoniasis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Sexually Transmitted Diseases
                Trichomoniasis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Urology
                Genitourinary Infections
                Condyloma Acuminata
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Sexually Transmitted Diseases
                Condyloma Acuminata
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Sexually Transmitted Diseases
                Chlamydia Infection
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Urology
                Genitourinary Infections
                Syphilis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Sexually Transmitted Diseases
                Syphilis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Bacterial Diseases
                Treponematoses
                Syphilis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Tropical Diseases
                Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Treponematoses
                Syphilis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Sexually Transmitted Diseases
                Custom metadata
                Data from the GUMCAD STI Surveillance System cannot be shared publicly because it contains sensitive patient-level data and their storage and access are under strict control. In its role providing infectious disease surveillance, Public Health England has permission to handle data obtained through the GUMCAD STI Surveillance System under Regulation 3 of the Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002. Patients do not provide consent for their data to be shared outside of PHE. Data requests can be made by contacting the GUMCAD ( GUMCAD@ 123456phe.gov.uk ) team but all publicly released data must adhere to PHE data sharing guidelines around small cell sizes.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article