3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differential Binding of Autoantibodies to MOG Isoforms in Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases

      research-article
      , MSc, , PhD, , MSc, , PhD, , MSc, , MSc, , PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, DPhil, , MD, DPhil, , FRCP, DM, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , PhD, , MD, , MD, , PhD, , MD, , PhD
      Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To analyze serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to major isoforms of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-alpha 1-3 and beta 1-3) in patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases.

          Methods

          Retrospective case-control study using 378 serum samples from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), patients with non-MS demyelinating disease, and healthy controls with MOG alpha-1-IgG positive (n = 202) or negative serostatus (n = 176). Samples were analyzed for their reactivity to human, mouse, and rat MOG isoforms with and without mutations in the extracellular MOG Ig domain (MOG-ecIgD), soluble MOG-ecIgD, and myelin from multiple species using live cell-based, tissue immunofluorescence assays and ELISA.

          Results

          The strongest IgG reactivities were directed against the longest MOG isoforms alpha-1 (the currently used standard test for MOG-IgG) and beta-1, whereas the other isoforms were less frequently recognized. Using principal component analysis, we identified 3 different binding patterns associated with non-MS disease: (1) isolated reactivity to MOG-alpha-1/beta-1 (n = 73), (2) binding to MOG-alpha-1/beta-1 and at least one other alpha, but no beta isoform (n = 64), and (3) reactivity to all 6 MOG isoforms (n = 65). The remaining samples were negative (n = 176) for MOG-IgG. These MOG isoform binding patterns were associated with a non-MS demyelinating disease, but there were no differences in clinical phenotypes or disease course. The 3 MOG isoform patterns had distinct immunologic characteristics such as differential binding to soluble MOG-ecIgD, sensitivity to MOG mutations, and binding to human MOG in ELISA.

          Conclusions

          The novel finding of differential MOG isoform binding patterns could inform future studies on the refinement of MOG-IgG assays and the pathophysiologic role of MOG-IgG.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

          The 2010 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis are widely used in research and clinical practice. Scientific advances in the past 7 years suggest that they might no longer provide the most up-to-date guidance for clinicians and researchers. The International Panel on Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis reviewed the 2010 McDonald criteria and recommended revisions. The 2017 McDonald criteria continue to apply primarily to patients experiencing a typical clinically isolated syndrome, define what is needed to fulfil dissemination in time and space of lesions in the CNS, and stress the need for no better explanation for the presentation. The following changes were made: in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and clinical or MRI demonstration of dissemination in space, the presence of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands allows a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis; symptomatic lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space or time in patients with supratentorial, infratentorial, or spinal cord syndrome; and cortical lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space. Research to further refine the criteria should focus on optic nerve involvement, validation in diverse populations, and incorporation of advanced imaging, neurophysiological, and body fluid markers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

            Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS) that is associated with serum aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG). Prior NMO diagnostic criteria required optic nerve and spinal cord involvement but more restricted or more extensive CNS involvement may occur. The International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) was convened to develop revised diagnostic criteria using systematic literature reviews and electronic surveys to facilitate consensus. The new nomenclature defines the unifying term NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD), which is stratified further by serologic testing (NMOSD with or without AQP4-IgG). The core clinical characteristics required for patients with NMOSD with AQP4-IgG include clinical syndromes or MRI findings related to optic nerve, spinal cord, area postrema, other brainstem, diencephalic, or cerebral presentations. More stringent clinical criteria, with additional neuroimaging findings, are required for diagnosis of NMOSD without AQP4-IgG or when serologic testing is unavailable. The IPND also proposed validation strategies and achieved consensus on pediatric NMOSD diagnosis and the concepts of monophasic NMOSD and opticospinal MS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing

              Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM (“red flags”) that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm
                Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm
                nnn
                NEURIMMINFL
                Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2332-7812
                July 2021
                15 June 2021
                15 June 2021
                : 8
                : 5
                : e1027
                Affiliations
                From the Clinical Department of Neurology (K.S., P.P., M.L., B.S., H.H., F.D.P., M.R.), Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria; Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG (S. Mindorf, N.R., C.P.), Lübeck, Germany; Institute for Quality Assurance (ifQ) affiliated to Euroimmun (M.P.), Lübeck, Germany; Department of Pediatrics (E.-M.W.), Olgahospital/Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany; Department of Pediatrics I (C.L., M.B.), Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria; Neurology Unit (S. Mariotto, S.F.), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy; Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Unit (A.S.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Spain; Beaumont Hospital (M.F.), Dublin, Ireland; Oxford Autoimmune Neurology Group (M.I.S.L., S.R.I., J.P., P.W.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Neuroimmunology and MS Research (A.L.), Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich & University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology (T.K.), Biomedical Center and University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany; Department of Neurology (S.V., R.M.), Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, France; Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Witten/Herdecke University, Children's Hospital Datteln, Germany; Department of Neurology (T.B.), Medical University of Vienna, Austria; and Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry (R.H.), Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Dr. Reindl markus.reindl@ 123456i-med.ac.at

                Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

                The Article Processing Charge was funded by Austrian Science Funds.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-8324
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-9748
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4142-2667
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-1402
                Article
                NEURIMMINFL2021038570
                10.1212/NXI.0000000000001027
                8207634
                34131067
                8358a661-e64e-4975-bec6-034cc3f5814d
                Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 04 January 2021
                : 15 April 2021
                Categories
                40
                132
                Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article