86
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and safety of vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), 15 and 20 mg/day: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study in the acute treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study assessed the efficacy, tolerability and safety of vortioxetine versus placebo in adults with recurrent major depressive disorder. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 608 patients [Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score≥26 and Clinical Global Impression – Severity score≥4]. Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1 : 1) to vortioxetine 15 mg/day, vortioxetine 20 mg/day, duloxetine 60 mg/day or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in MADRS total score at week 8 (mixed model for repeated measurements). Key secondary endpoints were: MADRS responders; Clinical Global Impression – Improvement scale score; MADRS total score in patients with baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale ≥20; remission (MADRS≤10); and Sheehan Disability Scale total score at week 8. On the primary efficacy endpoint, both vortioxetine doses were statistically significantly superior to placebo, with a mean difference to placebo ( n=158) of −5.5 (vortioxetine 15 mg, P<0.0001, n=149) and −7.1 MADRS points (vortioxetine 20 mg, P<0.0001, n=151). Duloxetine ( n=146) separated from placebo, thus validating the study. In all key secondary analyses, both vortioxetine doses were statistically significantly superior to placebo. Vortioxetine treatment was well tolerated; common adverse events (incidence≥5%) were nausea, headache, diarrhea, dry mouth and dizziness. No clinically relevant changes were seen in clinical safety laboratory values, weight, ECG or vital signs parameters. Vortioxetine was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure.

          The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is a self-report measure designed to enable investigators to easily obtain sensitive measures of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by subjects in various areas of daily functioning. The summary scores were found to be reliable and valid measures of these dimensions in a group of depressed outpatients. The Q-LES-Q measures were related to, but not redundant with, measures of overall severity of illness or severity of depression within this sample. These findings suggest that the Q-LES-Q measures may be sensitive to important differences among depressed patients that are not detected by the measures usually employed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

            We describe the functioning and well-being of patients with depression, relative to patients with chronic medical conditions or no chronic conditions. Data are from 11,242 outpatients in three health care provision systems in three US sites. Patients with either current depressive disorder or depressive symptoms in the absence of disorder tended to have worse physical, social, and role functioning, worse perceived current health, and greater bodily pain than did patients with no chronic conditions. The poor functioning uniquely associated with depressive symptoms, with or without depressive disorder, was comparable with or worse than that uniquely associated with eight major chronic medical conditions. For example, the unique association of days in bed with depressive symptoms was significantly greater than the comparable association with hypertension, diabetes, and arthritis. Depression and chronic medical conditions had unique and additive effects on patient functioning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX): reliability and validity.

              Although sexual dysfunction is common in psychiatric patients, quantification of sexual dysfunction is limited by the paucity of validated, user-friendly scales. In order to address this problem, the authors have developed the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX), a five-item rating scale that quantifies sex drive, arousal, vaginal lubrication/penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and satisfaction from orgasm. Possible total scores range from 5 to 30, with the higher scores indicating more sexual dysfunction. This study assesses the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity of the ASEX.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int Clin Psychopharmacol
                Int Clin Psychopharmacol
                YIC
                International Clinical Psychopharmacology
                Lippincott Williams And Wilkins
                0268-1315
                1473-5857
                May 2014
                04 April 2014
                : 29
                : 3
                : 138-149
                Affiliations
                [a ]University Department of Adult Psychiatry, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
                [b ]H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Jean-Philippe Boulenger, MD, University Department of Adult Psychiatry, Hôpital La Colombiere, CHRU de Montpellier, 39 Avenue Charles Flahault, F-34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France Tel: +33 4673 39753; fax: +33 4673 39660; e-mail: jp-boulenger@ 123456chu-montpellier.fr
                Article
                10.1097/YIC.0000000000000018
                3979887
                24257717
                83576d45-c2d6-445e-850b-4ed4d6dc9e8c
                © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

                History
                : 10 July 2013
                : 17 October 2013
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                duloxetine,montgomery–åsberg depression rating scale,placebo controlled,recurrent major depressive disorder,sheehan disability scale,vortioxetine

                Comments

                Comment on this article