2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio‐based transformation

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Economic sectors relying on the use of biological organisms, processes, and principles to create products and services are expected to experience accelerated growth due to innovation in the bioeconomy. Associated benefits and risks for sustainable development are increasingly subject to societal debate. We compiled expectation patterns from a global survey with bioeconomy experts and a systematic literature review identifying areas of consensus and controversy across dimensions of the sustainable development goals (SDG). Positive connotations dominated in both expert opinions and the scientific literature, but the level of consensus varied across sectors of the bioeconomy and in relation to applied methodological approaches (scientific literature) and type of employer (experts). In both sources, we found more differentiated views on potential impacts of bioeconomic development pathways on sustainability in more established bioeconomy‐related discourses, which indicates that expectation patterns in more recent fields of bio‐based innovation are subject to early “hype cycle” dynamics. Our findings suggest the need to systematically mainstream sustainability risk appraisals across relevant application contexts in technology impact assessments for the bioeconomy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Welcome to the Tidyverse

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A safe operating space for humanity.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.

              Rising demands for agricultural products will increase pressure to further intensify crop production, while negative environmental impacts have to be minimized. Ecological intensification entails the environmentally friendly replacement of anthropogenic inputs and/or enhancement of crop productivity, by including regulating and supporting ecosystem services management in agricultural practices. Effective ecological intensification requires an understanding of the relations between land use at different scales and the community composition of ecosystem service-providing organisms above and below ground, and the flow, stability, contribution to yield, and management costs of the multiple services delivered by these organisms. Research efforts and investments are particularly needed to reduce existing yield gaps by integrating context-appropriate bundles of ecosystem services into crop production systems. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Sustainable Development
                Sustainable Development
                Wiley
                0968-0802
                1099-1719
                September 2020
                May 20 2020
                September 2020
                : 28
                : 5
                : 1220-1235
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for Development Research (ZEF) University of Bonn Bonn Germany
                [2 ] Anthesis Group Frankfurt Germany
                [3 ] Institute of Political Science (IfPol) University of Muenster Münster Germany
                [4 ] Institute for Food‐ and Resource Economics (ILR) University of Bonn Bonn Germany
                Article
                10.1002/sd.2072
                83445f67-8660-4cd5-a6a9-d4a985ac6829
                © 2020

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article