Cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) usually arises from a subset of high-grade
squamous intraepithelial lesions (HG-SIL), which in turn are thought to arise from
a subset of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LG-SIL) (Holowaty et al, 1999;
Franco et al, 2001). Untreated SILs have the potential to regress, persist or progress,
and up to 8.6% of SILs recur locally following complete excision (Mohamed-Noor et
al, 1997; Hulman et al, 1998; Nagai et al, 2000; Chao et al, 2004). However, the molecular
pathology of cervical SILs is poorly understood and it is currently not possible to
predict the natural history of an individual lesion. Unnecessary follow-up of women
with cervical SILs destined not to progress or recur imposes large burdens on colposcopy
services worldwide and produces substantial adverse psychosocial consequences for
individual patients. There is therefore a very important requirement for new rational
and objective approaches to improving diagnosis and prediction of outcome in cervical
SIL.
Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is known to be an independent
risk factor for progression of LG-SIL to HG-SIL and for the development of SCC (Remmink
et al, 1995; Konno et al, 1998). However, HPV testing is inherently nonspecific at
identifying patients destined to develop cervical SCC (Sasieni, 2000) or HG-SIL (Lorincz
et al, 2002). Other biological factors of importance in the progression of SIL or
recurrence after treatment include persistence of HR-HPV (Costa et al, 2003), integration
of HR-HPV into host chromosomes and the acquisition of secondary host genomic abnormalities
(Lazo, 1999). Integration frequently causes disruption of the HR-HPV E2 transcriptional
repressor with consequent deregulation of HR-HPV oncogenes, events that we have recently
demonstrated to be important in inducing high-level genomic instability in cervical
keratinocytes in vitro (Pett et al, 2004).
Very little information is available as to whether particular host genomic abnormalities
in cervical SIL may be characteristic of lesion grade, HPV status or clinical outcome.
Allelic imbalances have been reported on numerous chromosome arms in cervical carcinomas
and small numbers of SILs (Steenbergen et al, 1996; Chu et al, 1999; Lazo, 1999; Pulido
et al, 2000), and there is some evidence of progressive accumulation of allelic imbalances
with increasing grade of abnormality. (Larson et al, 1997; Chu et al, 1999; Luft et
al, 1999; Chung et al, 2000; Lin et al, 2000; Chuaqui et al, 2001).
Likewise, data from comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) have been reported for
only relatively small numbers of cervical SILs (Heselmeyer et al, 1996; Kirchhoff
et al, 1999, 2001; Umayahara et al, 2002). These studies have generally suggested
that relatively few copy number imbalances (CNIs) exist in SIL. However, such data
should be interpreted with caution, since all studies used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded
tissue, in which DNA degradation may cause difficulties with CGH, and cells microdissected
under histological control do not appear to have been analysed in all studies (Kirchhoff
et al, 1999, 2001). Moreover, one study combined cases equivalent to LG-SIL with cases
equivalent to HG-SIL (Kirchhoff et al, 2001) and another examined SIL adjacent to
SCC (Umayahara et al, 2002), which may not represent typical SIL. Most importantly,
no study to date has correlated the number and type of CNIs in cervical SIL with key
clinicopathological information such as HPV status and postsurgical outcome.
We have therefore performed CGH using metaphase chromosome targets to investigate
the number and frequency of CNIs in a large series of 70 snap-frozen cervical SILs
from 70 different patients, in which the abnormal epithelium was microdissected from
serial frozen sections under histological control. None of the SILs was accompanied
by SCC. We had three objectives when performing this work. Firstly, we aimed to characterise
the number and locations of CNIs in cervical HG-SIL and LG-SIL. We analysed the stage
of disease progression at which individual abnormalities occurred, in order to identify
possible pathways of progression. We reasoned that any abnormalities present at similar
frequencies in LG-SIL and HG-SIL might represent early events in the pathogenesis
of SIL, while abnormalities present at a higher frequency in HG-SIL than in LG-SIL
might reflect those involved in disease progression.
Secondly, we sought to identify any associations between CNI and the state of the
HPV16 E2 gene in HPV16-positive HG-SILs. Initially, we performed HPV detection and
typing on all cases using nested PCR and reverse line hybridisation. In HG-SILs containing
HPV16, the HPV type most frequently associated with cervical SCC (Bosch et al, 1995),
we examined associations between CNIs and the presence or absence of the HPV16 E2
and E7 genes, as detected by PCR. We aimed to identify cases in which HPV16 E2 was
lost but HPV16 E7 was retained, as these cases would be expected to show derepression
of HR-HPV oncogenes. Previous validation studies using Southern blotting had shown
that such E2-negative/E7-positive cases contained HPV16 integrants in the absence
of HPV16 episomes (Das et al, 1992). The E2/E7 PCR technique was employed, as the
microdissected samples did not yield sufficient quantities of genomic DNA (gDNA) and
RNA to enable us to use optimal techniques for assessment of HR-HPV integration, such
as restriction site PCR (Thorland et al, 2000) or amplification of papillomavirus
oncogene transcripts (Wentzensen et al, 2002). The third and final aim of our study
was to assess the clinical value of selected host and viral parameters in predicting
recurrence of HG-SIL after complete excision by large loop excision of the transformation
zone (LLETZ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tissue
The experimental work was performed with the permission of the Cambridge Local Research
Ethics Committee (Ref: 03/023). The study used gDNA extracted from SIL epithelium
carefully microdissected from frozen sections of cervical tissue. The tissue was obtained
from LLETZ samples removed by a consultant gynaecologist from 70 different patients
undergoing treatment for cervical disease. None of the cases was associated with SCC.
The LLETZ samples were placed on ice after removal and study tissue was removed and
snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen within 30–60 min. Samples were numbered at the time
of recruitment. The histopathological diagnosis in the frozen sections for microdissection
was agreed by two consultant histopathologists. Of the 70 cases, 51 were HG-SIL (given
the prefix H; Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinicopathological data and frequency of CNIs in the 70 SILs studied. Prefix L denotes
low-grade SIL and prefix H denotes high-grade SIL. Clinical outcome is shown if noteworthy.
(ILE=inadequate local excision; No f/u=no follow-up data available; R-LG=recurred
with a histological diagnosis of LG-SIL; R-HG=recurred with a histological diagnosis
of HG-SIL; R-MiD=recurred with cytological mild dyskaryosis). Also listed are patient
age; HPV types detected in the 53 cases analysed; the presence or absence of the HPV16
E2 gene in cases of HG-SIL that were HPV16 positive and tested (n=23); and the number
of chromosome arms showing DNA CNI. Cases are sorted by a grade of SIL and then ranked
by the number of arms showing CNI. For each arm, white boxes indicate no CNI, green
boxes indicate gain, red boxes indicate loss and green/red striped boxes indicate
gain and loss on the same arm. No data are shown for chromosomes 16p, 19 and 22, for
which analysis by CGH is unreliable. In all 23 cases of HG-SIL tested for the state
of the HPV16 E2 gene, the HPV16 E7 gene was detectable.
) and 19 LG-SIL (given the prefix L). The median patient age was 30 years (range 19–63
years). Normal cervical epithelium and stroma were obtained from six hysterectomies
performed for non-neoplastic disease unrelated to the cervix.
Identification of disease recurrence
Cases of recurrence following complete local excision were identified from review
of patient records by appropriate medical practitioners. The median follow-up period
was 45 months (range 11–65 months), which is appropriate for assessment of local recurrence
(Mohamed-Noor et al, 1997; Hulman et al, 1998; Nagai et al, 2000; Chao et al, 2004).
Recurrence was defined as a diagnosis of SIL of either grade by histology or of dyskaryosis
of any grade by cytology provided the original lesion was reported as completely excised
and there had been at least one negative smear and/or biopsy between the original
LLETZ and the recurrence. ‘Borderline’ cytological abnormalities were not regarded
as recurrences. All samples were anonymised and researchers were blinded to the available
clinical data until the CGH analysis was complete.
Microdissection and DNA extraction
In all, 10 consecutive 10 μm sections were cut from each frozen tissue block. The
first and last were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and used as guides for
identifying SILs in the intervening unstained sections. The abnormal epithelium was
microdissected and collected using sterile scalpels under stereoscopic visualisation
in a microdissecting microscope at × 15–25 magnification. Some sections were stained
by H&E following microdissection, in order to assess the accuracy of the procedure.
In all cases, at least 80% of the microdissected tissue was composed of abnormal epithelium.
The microdissected tissue was placed in 50 μl of 10 mM Tris/1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) buffer
containing 0.4 μg μl−1 Proteinase K (Sigma, Poole UK) and incubated at 37°C overnight.
Genomic DNA for HPV typing was extracted from lysates of microdissected cells using
guanidinium isothiocyanate/silica as described (Boom et al, 1990).
HPV typing
PCR for HPV detection was performed as described previously (Strauss et al, 1999)
using the L1 consensus degenerate primers MY09 and MY11 for the initial amplification
(expected product size 452 bp) followed by a second-round nested PCR using the GP5-
and GP6-positive primers (expected product size 150 bp).
HPV typing was performed by reverse line hybridisation, as described elsewhere (Jordens
et al, 2000), using probes complementary to sequences of the L1 region of HPV types
2, 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 58, 59,
61, 62, 66, 67, 70, 72, 81 and Han 831. HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51,
52, 56, 58, 59 and 66 were regarded as HR-HPV (Munoz et al, 2003), while the other
types were regarded as low-risk HPV.
State of HPV16 E2 gene
Lysates of microdissected cells from HPV16-positive cases (where available) were used
to assess the presence or absence of the HPV16 E2 gene, with reference to the HPV16
E7 gene.
A measure of 5 μl of lysate was PCR amplified using the AmpliTaq Gold kit (Applied
Bioscience, Foster City, CA, USA): 25 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dNTPs, 5 U μl−1 AmpliTaq Gold
and 20 μ
M primer pairs for either full-length HPV16 E2 (forward: 5′-TGCGATGGATCCATGGAGACTCTTTGCCAACG-3′;
reverse: 5′-TGCGATGGATTCTCATATAGACATAAATCCAG-3′; expected product size 1139 bp) or
full-length HPV16 E7 (forward 5′-ATGCATGGAGATACACCTAC-3′; reverse 5′-TGGTTTCTGAGAACAGATGGG-3′;
expected product size 294 bp). HPV16 DNA in the pSPHPV-16 plasmid (Stanley et al,
1989) was used as a positive control.
Samples were considered positive for a particular reaction when a band of the appropriate
size was clearly identified. Cases showing equivocal positivity were not encountered
in this study. All amplifications were preformed in triplicate. On every occasion,
the presence or absence of a PCR product band was consistent for all three replicates.
Comparative genomic hybridisation
A measure of 5 μl of lysate of microdissected cells was used in a primary degenerate
oligonucleotide primed (DOP) PCR reaction as described previously (Roberts et al,
1999). Test probes were made by labelling 250 ng of primary DOP products in a secondary
DOP reaction incorporating digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). Reference
DNA was obtained from normal male peripheral blood lymphocytes and subjected to two
rounds of DOP–PCR, using biotin-16-dUTP in the secondary labelling reaction (Boehringer
Mannheim, Germany). The test and reference DNAs were sex mismatched in order to provide
an internal control.
Probes were made by ethanol coprecipitating 500 ng of test and reference products
together with 5 μg of Cot-1 DNA (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK). Hybridisation to normal
male metaphase spreads (Vysis, Richmond, UK) was as described previously (Sanoudou
et al, 2000; Roberts et al, 2001). The biotin and digoxigenin labels were detected
using avidin-Cy3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK) and antidigoxigenin
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Fab fragments (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes,
UK), respectively (Roberts et al, 2001).
For each case, seven to 12 metaphases were captured on an Axioplan II epifluorescence
microscope (Zeiss, Welwyn Garden City, UK) equipped with narrow bandpass filter blocks
for DAPI, Cy3 and FITC, a Sensys charge-coupled device camera (Photometrics, Tucson,
AZ, USA) and SmartCapture VP imaging software (Digital Scientific, Cambridge, UK).
Images were assessed using Quips CGH Analysis and Interpretation software (Vysis,
Richmond, UK). Nine normal–normal control hybridisations were performed using six
test samples from microdissected normal ectocervical epithelium and three test samples
from microdissected normal cervical stroma. Based on the results of these hybridisations,
the green-to-red (test-to-reference) fluorescence intensity ratio thresholds were
set to 0.85 for loss and 1.15 for gain.
Chromosomes 16p, 19 and 22 were excluded from the CGH analysis as they yield unreliable
CGH data (Kallioniemi et al, 1994; Zitzelsberger et al, 1997). The telomere of chromosome
1p was not excluded, as the SIL samples showed DNA gain at this region rather than
DNA loss (which can represent a spurious finding; Zitzelsberger et al, 1997), with
no evidence of such gain in the normal–normal hybridisations.
Statistical analysis
Differences in the number of CNIs per case between sample groups were compared using
the Mann–Whitney U-test. Differences in the frequency of individual CNIs between sample
groups were compared using the χ
2 test.
RESULTS
Clinical follow-up data
Of the 70 SILs examined by CGH, five had been inadequately excised and follow-up data
were not available for four (Figure 1). In total, 61 cases (46 HG-SIL; 15 LG-SIL)
were therefore completely excised and accompanied by adequate follow-up data. The
median follow-up time was 45 months (range 11–65 months). Seven cases recurred (11%),
of which six were HG-SIL (H16, H35, H36, H41, H50 and H51) and one was LG-SIL (L11).
Recurrence was diagnosed by histological examination in all of these cases, except
H36 where it was diagnosed by cytology. The median time for recurrence of the HG-SILs
was 15 months (range 11–22 months).
HPV typing
Sufficient DNA was available for HPV testing following CGH in 53 of the 70 cases.
HPV DNA was detected in all of these cases. In all, 15 different HPV types were detected
and multiple infections were seen in 20 (38%) cases. HR-HPV types were detected in
39 of 42 (93%) of the testable HG-SILs and in eight of 11 (73%) of the testable LG-SILs
(Figure 1). HPV16 was detected in 39 cases (33 HG-SIL, six LG-SIL), but only one case
(an HG-SIL) was HPV18 positive.
E2/E7 PCR
A total of 23 HPV16-positive HG-SILs had sufficient residual DNA to permit PCR assessment
of the presence of the HPV16 E2 and E7 genes (Figure 2
Figure 2
E2/E7 PCR in HPV16-positive HG-SILs. PCR for HPV16 E2 and HPV16 E7 genes in representative
cases of HPV16-positive HG-SILs. M=ΦX DNA ladder (HT Biotechnologies Ltd, Cambridge,
UK). The positive control pSPHPV-16 plasmid contains full-length HPV16. Whereas case
H33 contains intact E7 and E2, H26 contains intact E7 but disrupted E2.
). In total, 14 cases (61%) harboured HPV16 E7 but not HPV16 E2, consistent with integrated
HPV16 in the absence of HPV16 episomes. Nine cases (39%) harboured intact HPV16 E2
and HPV16 E7 genes.
Comparative genomic hybridisation
Associations with lesion grade
The summary of CGH copy number karyograms for all 70 cases examined are shown in Figure
3
Figure 3
Summary copy number karyogram for 19 LG-SILs (A) and 51 HG-SILs (B). Each green bar
to the right of a chromosome represents a region of DNA gain in a single case and
each red bar to the left of a chromosome represents a region of DNA loss in a single
case.
and the number and locations of chromosome arms involved for each case is shown in
Figure 1. There were more CNI per case in HG-SIL (median 6, range 0–20; n=51) than
in LG-SIL (median 4, range 0–13; n=19) (P=0.04) (Figures 1 and 4a
Figure 4
Number of CNIs per case according to selected clinicopathological features. Plots
show the median (line), interquartile range (box) and full range (whiskers) of numbers
of chromosome arms showing CNI per case in different groups of cases. There are significantly
more CNIs per case in: (A) HG-SILs vs LG-SILs (P=0.04); (B) HPV16-positive HG-SIL
with disrupted HPV16 E2 vs HPV16-positive HG-SIL with intact HPV16 E2 (P=0.026) and
(C) HG-SIL destined to recur post-LLETZ vs HG-SIL that did not recur (P=0.04).
).
The most frequently occurring abnormalities in the LG-SILs were gain on 1p (79%),
9q (47%), 17p (37%), 17q (32%) and 20q (32%) and loss on 4q (47%), 5q (32%), 2q (26%),
6q (26%), 9p (26%) and 13q (21%). The most frequently occurring abnormalities in the
HG-SILs were gain on 1p (80%), 17q (47%), 20q (47%), 9q (45%) and 17p (27%) and loss
on 4q (53%), 6q (43%), 2q (33%), 13q (25%) and 5q (24%).
Certain consistent regions of common gain and loss were identified, particularly gain
at 1pter-1p32, 3q14–21, 6p21.3–21.2 and 9q34 and loss at 2q22–32, 4q22–28, 5q14–23,
6cen-q21, 9q21, 11q12–13, 11q14–21, 12q15–21 and 13q21–22. We also noted rarer gains
at 3p21, 14q24 and 15q22 and rarer losses at 7p21, 7q21 and 14q12–13. No regions of
amplification (test-to-reference fluorescence ratio >1.5) were seen in any case.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Frequency of selected CNIs in LG- and HG-SILs. Bars above the x-axis indicate the
percentage frequency of gains on a chromosomal arm, and bars below the x-axis indicate
the percentage frequency of losses on a chromosomal arm. Yellow bars=LG-SILs; blue
bars=HG-SILs.
shows the frequency of gain and loss of selected chromosome arms in all cases examined.
Some CNIs occurred at essentially similar frequencies in HG-SIL and LG-SIL, including
gains on 1p and 9q and losses on 4q, 5q, 6q and 13q. In contrast, gains on 1q, 3q
and 16q were found frequently in HG-SIL but not at all in LG-SIL (P<0.05 for each).
Gain on 3q was seen in 10 cases of HG-SIL (20%) and was the only abnormality in one
case. Gain of 6p was also seen frequently in HG-SIL (22%) but only in a single LG-SIL.
Associations with state of the HPV16 E2 gene in HPV16-positive HG-SIL
There were more CNIs per case in the 14 HPV16-positive HG-SIL cases with loss of the
HPV16 E2 gene and retention of the HPV16 E7 gene (median 10.5, range 3–20), compared
to the nine HPV16-positive HG-SIL cases with intact HPV16 E2 and HPV16 E7 (median
5, range 0–15) (P=0.026) (Figure 4b). The cases with loss of E2 also showed more frequent
gain on 3q (P<0.05). On the other hand, we did observe high numbers of CNIs in some
cases of HG-SIL in which the E2 gene was retained (e.g. case H38, which had 15 aberrant
chromosome arms).
Associations with clinical outcome in HG-SIL
Of the 46 cases of completely excised HG-SIL with adequate follow-up data, there were
more CNIs in the six cases that were destined to recur (median 10, range 6–15) than
in the 40 that did not recur (median 5.5, range 0–18) (P=0.04) (Figure 4c). Loss of
4q (P=0.01) and loss of 5q (P<0.05) were more frequent in the HG-SILs destined to
recur than in those that did not recur.
DISCUSSION
We have identified more CNIs per case than previously reported in SIL. We observed
a median of four CNIs per case in LG-SIL and six CNIs per case in HG-SIL, compared,
for example, to a mean of 1.1 CNIs per case in lesions equivalent to LG-SIL and a
mean of 4.1 CNIs per case in lesions equivalent to HG-SIL in a previous report (Umayahara
et al, 2002). Our study has the advantages of using frozen sections of cervical SILs
(unaccompanied by SCC) from which the lesional epithelium was microdissected, which
may allow for greater sensitivity in detecting CNIs. On the other hand, it should
be noted that the thresholds used for determination of copy number gain and loss have
been greater in previous studies of cervical SIL (Heselmeyer et al, 1996; Kirchhoff
et al, 1999; Umayahara et al, 2002).
Our data indicate that certain recurrent CNIs occur in both cervical LG-SIL and HG-SIL
and suggest that there may also be sequential acquisition of imbalances during the
progression from LG-SIL to HG-SIL. While the CNIs that occur at similar frequencies
in LG-SIL and HG-SIL are consistent with early events, those that are significantly
more frequent in HG-SIL may confer a selective advantage to LG-SIL cells and contribute
to progression via clonal selection. Alternatively, the latter CNIs may represent
an advantageous consequence of increased chromosomal instability in HG-SIL (Pett et
al, 2004) and be of greater relevance in favouring subsequent progression to SCC.
CGH losses reported here are consistent with sites of allelic imbalance previously
reported in cervical SIL and SCC (Lazo, 1999), including 3p12–3p14.1 (Larson et al,
1997; Chu et al, 1999; Chung et al, 2000), 4p16 (Larson et al, 1997), 4q21–q35 (Larson
et al, 1997), 6p14–22 (Chatterjee et al, 2001; Steenbergen et al, 2001), 6q22–q27
(Chuaqui et al, 2001), 9p21 (Lin et al, 2000), 11p14–15 and 11q23 (Luft et al, 1999;
Pulido et al, 2000). Further investigation of these sites of potential tumour suppressor
genes is warranted.
We observed gain of 3q in 20% of 51 HG-SIL cases. Whereas this imbalance was initially
described as defining the transition to SCC in the cervix (Heselmeyer et al, 1996),
it was subsequently reported in eight of 37 (22%) paraffin-embedded ‘dysplastic’ lesions
equivalent to HG-SIL (Kirchhoff et al, 1999; Kirchhoff et al, 2001), an observation
that is supported by our data. Interestingly, we found that six of the 10 HG-SILs
in our study that showed gain of 3q also showed loss on 3p or 13q, also supporting
the previous suggestion of an association between these abnormalities (Kirchhoff et
al, 1999). Our findings are consistent with the earlier identification of 3q25–q27
as the consensus region of gain.
Cases of HPV16-positive HG-SIL in which the E2 gene was disrupted showed significantly
more CNIs and significantly more frequent gain on 3q than cases in which the E2 gene
was intact. Data from the PCR approach that we used to detect E2 and E7 have previously
been shown to correlate with the physical state of HPV in clinical specimens, as determined
by Southern blotting (Das et al, 1992). Loss of E2 (with retention of E7) is consistent
with the presence of integrated HPV16 in the absence of HPV16 episomes. The presence
of the HPV16 E2 gene could either be due to episomal HPV16 or to integrated HPV16
in which the gene is retained, for example, following concatamerisation of the integrants.
Our finding that the E2 gene was disrupted in 14 of 23 (61%) testable HG-SILs is consistent
with previous PCR data (Tonon et al, 2001). Greater chromosomal instability following
loss of the E2 gene is likely to be associated with derepression of the HPV16 oncogenes
E7 and E6, which can cooperate in the induction of mitotic defects and genomic instability
(Duensing et al, 2000; Plug-DeMaggio et al, 2004).
For some cases at least, loss of HR-HPV E2 may therefore be a significant intermediate
step in cervical oncogenesis, occurring between infection with HR-HPV and the development
of chromosomal instability. Indeed, these data support our recent in vitro observations
that integration of HPV16 in cervical keratinocytes, with disruption of the E2 gene
as is typically seen in vivo, is closely associated with the development of high-level
genomic instability (Pett et al, 2004). On the other hand, our identification in the
present study of cases of HG-SIL that retain the HPV16 E2 gene yet show numerous CNIs
(e.g. case H38, with 15 aberrant arms) is consistent with the notion that loss of
E2 function is not essential for chromosomal instability to develop in cervical keratinocytes.
It should be noted, however, that the low cell yield provided by the microdissection
approach that we chose to adopt did not enable us to assess levels of E2 gene expression
in the samples that we examined. Moreover, because of clonal heterogeneity within
SILs, cells containing the E2 gene may have been different to those showing numerous
CNIs.
Of the 46 cases of HG-SIL in our study with histologically clear excision margins
and adequate follow-up data, six (13%) recurred. This rate of local recurrence is
broadly similar to that described by other authors (Hulman et al, 1998; Nagai et al,
2000). HG-SILs destined to recur showed significantly more CNIs and significantly
more frequent loss of 4q and 5q than HG-SILs that did not recur. Our observations
were made on relatively small numbers of cases, using a whole genome approach that
would not be appropriate for routine clinical use. However, our data support the notion
that detection of one or more specific host cell abnormalities (either alone or in
combination with tests of HPV type, physical state, etc.) may ultimately prove to
be of value in risk stratification and clinical management of cervical SILs.
It is likely that shared risk factors underlie the association that we have observed
between the number of CNIs in HG-SIL and lesional recurrence despite complete local
excision. Most important may be viral factors, such as persistence and integration
of HR-HPV (Cuzick, 1997; Cruickshank et al, 2002). However, there may also be a role
for host genetic polymorphisms, such as those affecting TP53 (Klug et al, 2001) or
local host immunity (Cuzick et al, 2000; Maciag et al, 2000), and/or environmental
factors such as smoking, local hormonal effects and other sexually transmitted diseases
(Kjellberg et al, 2000).
In summary, we have obtained molecular cytogenetic data that are consistent with a
model of sequential acquisition of genomic CNIs in the development and progression
of cervical SIL. We show that a high number of CNIs, as well as particular sites of
imbalance, are associated with loss of the HPV16 E2 gene in HPV16-positive HG-SIL
and with recurrence of HG-SIL after adequate local excision. It may ultimately be
possible to improve the prediction of postsurgical outcome in SIL by assessing specific
genomic abnormalities in the excised lesion. Our findings now require validation in
a different, larger group of cases, using higher resolution approaches.