3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inducing Error Management Culture – Evidence From Experimental Team Studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Field studies indicate that error management culture can be beneficial for organizational performance. The question of whether and how error management culture can be induced remained unanswered. We conducted two experiments with newly formed teams, in which we aimed to induce error management culture and to explore whether we would also find beneficial effects of error management culture on performance in an experimental setting. Furthermore, we tested whether culture strength moderates the relationship between error management culture and performance. In Study 1, we used two tasks that require rational problem solving. In Study 2, we used a task that requires creative problem solving. We successfully manipulated error management culture in terms of an effect on perceived error management culture within the teams. While we did not find a direct effect of error management culture on performance, Study 2 revealed an indirect effect via communication in the teams. To our surprise, culture strength did not influence the hypothesized relationship. We discuss potential theoretical and alternative explanations for our results, and provide an outlook for future studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

            Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) is a relatively new website that contains the major elements required to conduct research: an integrated participant compensation system; a large participant pool; and a streamlined process of study design, participant recruitment, and data collection. In this article, we describe and evaluate the potential contributions of MTurk to psychology and other social sciences. Findings indicate that (a) MTurk participants are slightly more demographically diverse than are standard Internet samples and are significantly more diverse than typical American college samples; (b) participation is affected by compensation rate and task length, but participants can still be recruited rapidly and inexpensively; (c) realistic compensation rates do not affect data quality; and (d) the data obtained are at least as reliable as those obtained via traditional methods. Overall, MTurk can be used to obtain high-quality data inexpensively and rapidly.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              r-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                21 January 2022
                2021
                : 12
                : 716915
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Work-, Organizational- and Business Psychology, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität/Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg , Hamburg, Germany
                [2] 2Faculty of Business and Economics, Institute for Management and Organisation, Leuphana University of Lüneburg , Lüneburg, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Organizational and Business Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Technical University of Darmstadt , Darmstadt, Germany
                [4] 4Asia School of Business (in collaboration with MIT Sloan Management) , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [5] 5Department of Management and Organization, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore , Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes

                Edited by: Carlos María Alcover, Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain

                Reviewed by: Athena Xenikou, Hellenic Air Force Academy, Greece; Matthias Weiss, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany

                *Correspondence: Alexander Klamar, klamar@ 123456hsu-hh.de

                ORCID: Alexander Klamar, orcid.org/0000-0002-5983-3707; Dorothee Horvath, orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-1720; Nina Keith, orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-1297; Michael Frese, orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-4395

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716915
                8815329
                35126221
                82c9986c-51e5-4e3b-8eb4-eaa15e30bcef
                Copyright © 2022 Klamar, Horvath, Keith and Frese.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 May 2021
                : 21 December 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 9, Equations: 0, References: 55, Pages: 18, Words: 14634
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, doi 10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: FR 638/38-1
                Award ID: KE 1377/4-1
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                errors,job and task performance,domain-specific culture,culture/climate change,culture/climate strength

                Comments

                Comment on this article