51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 4 , 9 , 7 , 3 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 3 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 13 , 17 , 18 , 11 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 3 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 22 , 12 , 30 , 12 , 31 , 12 , 32 , 1 , 33 , 34 , 16 , 35 , 1 , 10 , 36 , 37 , 1 , 38 , 39 , 12 , 5 , 40 , 13 , 41 , 12 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 1
      Ecology Letters
      Wiley
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances.

          Understanding the processes shaping biological communities under multiple disturbances is a core challenge in ecology and conservation science. Traditionally, ecologists have explored linkages between the severity and type of disturbance and the taxonomic structure of communities. Recent advances in the application of species traits, to assess the functional structure of communities, have provided an alternative approach that responds rapidly and consistently across taxa and ecosystems to multiple disturbances. Importantly, trait-based metrics may provide advanced warning of disturbance to ecosystems because they do not need species loss to be reactive. Here, we synthesize empirical evidence and present a theoretical framework, based on species positions in a functional space, as a tool to reveal the complex nature of change in disturbed ecosystems. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.

            Rising demands for agricultural products will increase pressure to further intensify crop production, while negative environmental impacts have to be minimized. Ecological intensification entails the environmentally friendly replacement of anthropogenic inputs and/or enhancement of crop productivity, by including regulating and supporting ecosystem services management in agricultural practices. Effective ecological intensification requires an understanding of the relations between land use at different scales and the community composition of ecosystem service-providing organisms above and below ground, and the flow, stability, contribution to yield, and management costs of the multiple services delivered by these organisms. Research efforts and investments are particularly needed to reduce existing yield gaps by integrating context-appropriate bundles of ecosystem services into crop production systems. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems.

              Bees provide essential pollination services that are potentially affected both by local farm management and the surrounding landscape. To better understand these different factors, we modelled the relative effects of landscape composition (nesting and floral resources within foraging distances), landscape configuration (patch shape, interpatch connectivity and habitat aggregation) and farm management (organic vs. conventional and local-scale field diversity), and their interactions, on wild bee abundance and richness for 39 crop systems globally. Bee abundance and richness were higher in diversified and organic fields and in landscapes comprising more high-quality habitats; bee richness on conventional fields with low diversity benefited most from high-quality surrounding land cover. Landscape configuration effects were weak. Bee responses varied slightly by biome. Our synthesis reveals that pollinator persistence will depend on both the maintenance of high-quality habitats around farms and on local management practices that may offset impacts of intensive monoculture agriculture. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecology Letters
                Ecol Lett
                Wiley
                1461-023X
                1461-0248
                April 07 2019
                April 07 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter University of Würzburg Am Hubland 97074 Würzburg Germany
                [2 ]Institute for Alpine Environment Eurac Research Viale Druso 1 39100 Bozen/Bolzano Italy
                [3 ]Centre for Environmental and Climate Research Lund University 22362 Lund Sweden
                [4 ]MTA Centre for Ecological Research Institute for Ecology and Botany Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group Alkotmány u. 2‐4 2163 Vácrátót Hungary
                [5 ]Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SE‐750 07 Uppsala Sweden
                [6 ]Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Dutton Park Queensland Australia
                [7 ]Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research School of Agriculture, Policy and Development Reading University RG6 6AR UK
                [8 ]Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group Wageningen University Droevendaalsesteeg 3 6708PB Wageningen The Netherlands
                [9 ]DAFNAE University of Padova Viale dell'Università 16 35020 Legnaro (Padova) Italy
                [10 ]Department of Biology Lund University 223 62 Lund Sweden
                [11 ]UMR 6553 Ecobio CNRS Université de Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex France
                [12 ]Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope Reckenholzstrasse 191 8046 Zurich Switzerland
                [13 ]Departamento de Biología Animal (Área de Zoología) Facultad de Biología Universidad de Salamanca Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n 37007 SalamancaSpain
                [14 ]UMR BAGAP – INRA Agrocampus Ouest, ESA 49000 Angers France
                [15 ]Institute of Applied Sciences, Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology (MCAST) Paola Malta
                [16 ]Institute of Life Sciences Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33 I‐56127 Pisa Italy
                [17 ]Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) E‐41092 Sevilla Spain
                [18 ]MTA ÖK Lendület Landscape and Conservation Ecology Research Group Alkotmány u. 2‐4 2163 Vácrátót Hungary
                [19 ]Department of Arthropods Natural Sciences Museum of Barcelona Castell dels Tres Dragons, Picasso Av 08003 Barcelona Spain
                [20 ]Department of Biogeography and Global Change National Museum of Natural Sciences Spanish National Research Council (BGC‐MNCN‐CSIC) C/Serrano 115 bis E‐28006 Madrid Spain
                [21 ]Mediterranean Institute of Marine and Terrestrial Biodiversity and Ecology (IMBE) Aix‐Marseille University CNRS IRD, Univ. Avignon 13545 Aix‐en‐ProvenceFrance
                [22 ]Department of Landscape Ecology Kiel University Olshausenstrasse 75 24118 Kiel Germany
                [23 ]Biometry& Environmental System Analysis University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
                [24 ]Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
                [25 ]Institute for Environmental Sciences University of Koblenz‐Landau Fortstr. 7 76829 Landau Germany
                [26 ]Department of Conservation Ecology Faculty of Biology Philipps‐University Marburg Karl‐von‐Frisch Str. 8 35043 Marburg Germany
                [27 ]Restoration Ecology Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management Technische Universität München 85354 Freising Germany
                [28 ]University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research Institute of Zoology Gregor Mendel Straße 33 A‐1180 Vienna Austria
                [29 ]Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD) Sede Andina Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Mitre 630 CP 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro Argentina
                [30 ]Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad INABIO – Facultad de Ciencias Agícolas Universidad Central del Ecuador Quito170129 Ecuador
                [31 ]Department of Animal Ecology Justus Liebig University Heinrich‐Buff‐Ring 26‐32 D‐35392 Giessen Germany
                [32 ]Faculty of Biology Institute of Zoology University of Belgrade Studentski trg 16 Belgrade11 000Serbia
                [33 ]INRA UR 406 Abeilles et Environnement, Site Agroparc 84914 AvignonFrance
                [34 ]Marshall Agroecology Ltd Winscombe UK
                [35 ]INDEHESA Forestry School Universidad de Extremadura Plasencia10600 Spain
                [36 ]INRA UMR 1065 SAVE ISVV Université de Bordeaux Bordeaux Sciences Agro F‐33883 Villenave d'OrnonFrance
                [37 ]Animal Ecology Team Wageningen Environmental Research Droevendaalsesteeg 3 6708 PB Wageningen The Netherlands
                [38 ]Institute of Ecology and Evolution University of Bern CH‐3012 Bern Switzerland
                [39 ]CABI Rue des Grillons 1 2800 Delémont Switzerland
                [40 ]Natural Resources Research Laboratory Bremer Str. 15 29308 Winsen Germany
                [41 ]Agroecology, University of Göttingen Grisebachstrasse 6 37077Göttingen Germany
                [42 ]Department of Crop Protection Geisenheim University Von‐Lade‐Str. 1 65366 Geisenheim Germany
                [43 ]LfL Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft Institut für Ökologischen Landbau Bodenkultur und Ressourcenschutz Lange Point 12 85354 Freising Germany
                [44 ]Department of Zoology & Biology Faculty of Sciences Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi Rawalpindi Pakistan
                Article
                10.1111/ele.13265
                30957401
                82a60226-6d30-478d-b352-495cb54b1a45
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article