16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The modified Dunn procedure provides superior short-term outcomes in the treatment of the unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis as compared to the inadvertent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning: a comparative clinical study.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and radiographic correction after modified Dunn procedure versus inadvertent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for the treatment of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int Orthop
          International orthopaedics
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1432-5195
          0341-2695
          March 2019
          : 43
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Hunnewell Building, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Eduardo.Novais@childrens.harvard.edu.
          [2 ] Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
          [3 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
          [4 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
          Article
          10.1007/s00264-018-3993-9
          10.1007/s00264-018-3993-9
          29797165
          82907399-4705-4a7f-8bac-1605458b62d8
          History

          Modified Dunn procedure,In-situ pinning,Unstable SCFE,Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

          Comments

          Comment on this article