32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in mRNA COVID-19-vaccinated and unvaccinated populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To summarise the available evidence on the risk of myocarditis and/or pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, compared with the risk among unvaccinated individuals in the absence of COVID-19 infection.

          Design

          Systematic review and meta-analysis.

          Data sources

          Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and WHO Global Literature on Coronavirus Disease), preprint repositories (medRxiv and bioRxiv), reference lists and grey literature were searched from 1 December 2020 until 31 October 2022.

          Study selection

          Epidemiological studies of individuals of any age who received at least one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, reported a risk of myo/pericarditis and compared the risk of myo/pericarditis to individuals who did not receive any dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

          Data extraction and synthesis

          Two reviewers independently conducted screening and data extraction. The rate of myo/pericarditis among vaccinated and unvaccinated groups was recorded, and the rate ratios were calculated. Additionally, the total number of individuals, case ascertainment criteria, percentage of males and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were extracted for each study. Meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model.

          Results

          Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, of which six were included in the quantitative synthesis. Our meta-analysis indicates that within 30-day follow-up period, vaccinated individuals were twice as likely to develop myo/pericarditis in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals, with a rate ratio of 2.05 (95% CI 1.49–2.82).

          Conclusion

          Although the absolute number of observed myo/pericarditis cases remains quite low, a higher risk was detected in those who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations compared with unvaccinated individuals in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given the effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in preventing severe illnesses, hospitalisations and deaths, future research should focus on accurately determining the rates of myo/pericarditis linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, understanding the biological mechanisms behind these rare cardiac events and identifying those most at risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references97

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2023
                20 June 2023
                20 June 2023
                : 13
                : 6
                : e065687
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science , Ringgold_6339Carleton University , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]departmentSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine , Ringgold_6363University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Risk Sciences International , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]departmentArnold School of Public Health , Ringgold_49112University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
                [5 ]departmentBruyère Research Institute , Ringgold_12365University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]Ringgold_10055Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health , Ringgold_5620McGill University , Montreal, Québec, Canada
                [8 ]departmentDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics , University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ]departmentFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Ringgold_8166The University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [10 ]departmentDivision of Human Sciences , Ringgold_26627NOSM University , Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
                [11 ]Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [12 ]departmentObservatorio de Salud Pública , Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [13 ]departmentDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine , University of Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [14 ]departmentDepartment of Neurosciences, Faculty of Science , Ringgold_120862Carleton University , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Abdallah Alami; abdallahalami@ 123456cmail.carleton.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7500-0644
                Article
                bmjopen-2022-065687
                10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065687
                10314577
                37339840
                81f53cec-a9f2-4d31-8d85-5366c2cac5f5
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 June 2022
                : 23 May 2023
                Categories
                Epidemiology
                1506
                2474
                1692
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked
                free

                Medicine
                covid-19,epidemiology,public health
                Medicine
                covid-19, epidemiology, public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article