14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Accelerating environmental flow implementation to bend the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Environmental flows (e-flows) aim to mitigate the threat of altered hydrological regimes in river systems and connected waterbodies and are an important component of integrated strategies to address multiple threats to freshwater biodiversity. Expanding and accelerating implementation of e-flows can support river conservation and help to restore the biodiversity and resilience of hydrologically altered and water-stressed rivers and connected freshwater ecosystems. While there have been significant developments in e-flow science, assessment, and societal acceptance, implementation of e-flows within water resource management has been slower than required and geographically uneven. This review explores critical factors that enable successful e-flow implementation and biodiversity outcomes in particular, drawing on 13 case studies and the literature. It presents e-flow implementation as an adaptive management cycle enabled by 10 factors: legislation and governance, financial and human resourcing, stakeholder engagement and co-production of knowledge, collaborative monitoring of ecological and social-economic outcomes, capacity training and research, exploration of trade-offs among water users, removing or retrofitting water infrastructure to facilitate e-flows and connectivity, and adaptation to climate change. Recognising that there may be barriers and limitations to the full and effective enablement of each factor, the authors have identified corresponding options and generalizable recommendations for actions to overcome prominent constraints, drawing on the case studies and wider literature. The urgency of addressing flow-related freshwater biodiversity loss demands collaborative networks to train and empower a new generation of e-flow practitioners equipped with the latest tools and insights to lead adaptive environmental water management globally. Mainstreaming e-flows within conservation planning, integrated water resource management, river restoration strategies, and adaptations to climate change is imperative. The policy drivers and associated funding commitments of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework offer crucial opportunities to achieve the human benefits contributed by e-flows as nature-based solutions, such as flood risk management, floodplain fisheries restoration, and increased river resilience to climate change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.

          A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecological systems (SESs). Without a common framework to organize findings, isolated knowledge does not cumulate. Until recently, accepted theory has assumed that resource users will never self-organize to maintain their resources and that governments must impose solutions. Research in multiple disciplines, however, has found that some government policies accelerate resource destruction, whereas some resource users have invested their time and energy to achieve sustainability. A general framework is used to identify 10 subsystem variables that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to achieve a sustainable SES.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity

            In the 12 years since Dudgeon et al. (2006) reviewed major pressures on freshwater ecosystems, the biodiversity crisis in the world's lakes, reservoirs, rivers, streams and wetlands has deepened. While lakes, reservoirs and rivers cover only 2.3% of the Earth's surface, these ecosystems host at least 9.5% of the Earth's described animal species. Furthermore, using the World Wide Fund for Nature's Living Planet Index, freshwater population declines (83% between 1970 and 2014) continue to outpace contemporaneous declines in marine or terrestrial systems. The Anthropocene has brought multiple new and varied threats that disproportionately impact freshwater systems. We document 12 emerging threats to freshwater biodiversity that are either entirely new since 2006 or have since intensified: (i) changing climates; (ii) e-commerce and invasions; (iii) infectious diseases; (iv) harmful algal blooms; (v) expanding hydropower; (vi) emerging contaminants; (vii) engineered nanomaterials; (viii) microplastic pollution; (ix) light and noise; (x) freshwater salinisation; (xi) declining calcium; and (xii) cumulative stressors. Effects are evidenced for amphibians, fishes, invertebrates, microbes, plants, turtles and waterbirds, with potential for ecosystem-level changes through bottom-up and top-down processes. In our highly uncertain future, the net effects of these threats raise serious concerns for freshwater ecosystems. However, we also highlight opportunities for conservation gains as a result of novel management tools (e.g. environmental flows, environmental DNA) and specific conservation-oriented actions (e.g. dam removal, habitat protection policies, managed relocation of species) that have been met with varying levels of success. Moving forward, we advocate hybrid approaches that manage fresh waters as crucial ecosystems for human life support as well as essential hotspots of biodiversity and ecological function. Efforts to reverse global trends in freshwater degradation now depend on bridging an immense gap between the aspirations of conservation biologists and the accelerating rate of species endangerment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing nature's contributions to people

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Environmental Reviews
                Environ. Rev.
                Canadian Science Publishing
                1181-8700
                1208-6053
                July 06 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland 4111, Australia
                [2 ]WWF-UK, Living Planet Centre, Woking GU21 4LL, UK
                [3 ] IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, Delft, AX 2611, the Netherlands, and Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, CN 2628, the Netherlands
                [4 ]Hydro-Ecology Consulting Ltd., Wallingford OX100LY, UK
                [5 ]Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford OX108BB, UK
                [6 ] Department of Earth and Environment and Institute of Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
                [7 ]WWF India, 172 B, Lodi Estate, New Delhi 110003, India
                [8 ] International Water Management Institute, Sunil Mawatha, Pelawatte, Battaramulla, Colombo, 10120, Sri Lanka
                [9 ]The University of Melbourne, Infrastructure Engineering, 700 Swanston St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
                [10 ] Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canadian Rivers Institute, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
                [11 ] School of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Nelspruit, Mpumalanga 1200, South Africa
                [12 ] School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
                [13 ]Global Science, World Wildlife Fund, 1250 24th St., NW Washington, DC 20037, USA
                [14 ]International Water Management Institute, CSIR Campus, No. 6 Agostino Neto Road, Airport Residential Area, Accra GA-038-4001, Ghana
                [15 ] Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA, and Centre for Applied Water Science, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
                [16 ]Sustainable Waters, 5834 St. George Avenue, Crozet, VA 22932, USA
                [17 ]El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Villahermosa-Reforma km 15.5, El Guineo II, Villahermosa 86280, Mexico
                [18 ]WWF Zambia., Plot 4978, Los Angeles Boulevard, Longacres, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
                [19 ] Riverfutures, Derbyshire SK17 8SX, UK, and Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Queensland 4111, Australia
                [20 ]Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
                Article
                10.1139/er-2022-0126
                81b99040-c461-4695-845f-cd98adb4247c
                © 2023

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article