For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
Inviting an author to review:
Study on the correlation between leisure activities and cognitive impairment in middle‐aged and elderly people in High‐altitude environment
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
Article has an altmetric score of 9
12
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      93
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Turning Your Presentations/Posters to Publications

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A scientific manuscript or paper is invariably the ultimate goal of most scientific endeavors and in a majority of cases, the final manuscript often begins as an abstract submitted to a conference to be presented as either a poster or an oral presentation. It is practically possible for authors to use a conference presentation as a basic template to expand and write a complete manuscript. However, it is imperative for authors to acknowledge the limitations of these abstracts and make attempts to improve the quality of work before embarking on writing a full-length manuscript. This article aims to provide a structured approach to how to write a paper primarily based on a conference abstract, along with examples and limitations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.

          Daniël A Korevaar, René Spijker, Lotty Hooft … (2014)
          Poor reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies impedes an objective appraisal of the clinical performance of diagnostic tests. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement, first published in 2003, aims to improve the reporting quality of such studies. To investigate to which extent published diagnostic accuracy studies adhere to the 25-item STARD checklist, whether the reporting quality has improved after STARD's launch and whether there are any factors associated with adherence. We performed a systematic review and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Methodology Register of the Cochrane Library for studies that primarily aimed to examine the reporting quality of articles on diagnostic accuracy studies in humans by evaluating adherence to STARD. Study selection was performed in duplicate; data were extracted by one author and verified by the second author. We included 16 studies, analysing 1496 articles in total. Three studies investigated adherence in a general sample of diagnostic accuracy studies; the others did so in a specific field of research. The overall mean number of items reported varied from 9.1 to 14.3 between 13 evaluations that evaluated all 25 STARD items. Six studies quantitatively compared post-STARD with pre-STARD articles. Combining these results in a random-effects meta-analysis revealed a modest but significant increase in adherence after STARD's introduction (mean difference 1.41 items (95% CI 0.65 to 2.18)). The reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies was consistently moderate, at least through halfway the 2000s. Our results suggest a small improvement in the years after the introduction of STARD. Adherence to STARD should be further promoted among researchers, editors and peer reviewers.
          Article 0 comments Cited 48 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
          Article has an altmetric score of 17
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

            Patrick Bossuyt, Johannes Reitsma, David Bruns … (2003)
            To improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy, to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in a study, and to evaluate a study's generalisability. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) steering committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and extracted potential items into an extensive list. Researchers, editors, and members of professional organisations shortened this list during a two day consensus meeting, with the goal of developing a checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy. The search for published guidelines about diagnostic research yielded 33 previously published checklists, from which we extracted a list of 75 potential items. At the consensus meeting, participants shortened the list to a 25 item checklist, by using evidence, whenever available. A prototype of a flow diagram provides information about the method of patient recruitment, the order of test execution, and the numbers of patients undergoing the test under evaluation and the reference standard, or both. Evaluation of research depends on complete and accurate reporting. If medical journals adopt the STARD checklist and flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve to the advantage of clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals, and the public.
            Article 0 comments Cited 35 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Article has an altmetric score of 27
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Be positive about negatives–recommendations for the publication of negative (or null) results

              Anton Bespalov, Thomas Steckler, Phil Skolnick (2019)
              Article 0 comments Cited 20 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Article has an altmetric score of 96
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Indian J Radiol Imaging
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Indian J Radiol Imaging
                Journal ID (doi): 10.1055/s-00050590
                Title: The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging
                Publisher: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India )
                ISSN (Print): 0971-3026
                ISSN (Electronic): 1998-3808
                Publication date (Electronic): 09 January 2025
                Publication date Collection: January 2025
                Publication date PMC-release: 1 January 2025
                Volume: 35
                Issue: Suppl 1
                Pages: S143-S147
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
                [2 ]Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Jitender Saini, MD, DM Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560029, KarnatakaIndia jsaini76@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9385-291X
                Article
                Publisher ID: IJRI-24-9-3726
                DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800864
                PMC ID: 11717449
                SO-VID: 81a1ec08-10c0-4e07-953a-8869c9fd3a13
                Copyright © Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
                License:

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Early Career Fellowship
                Award ID: IA/CPHE/21/1/505953
                Funding S.P. is currently supported by the DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Early Career Fellowship (IA/CPHE/21/1/505953).
                Categories
                Subject: Research and Publications: Contemporary and Beyond
                Subject: Review Article

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Radiology & Imaging
                Keywords: manuscripts,publications,abstracts
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Radiology & Imaging
                Keywords: manuscripts, publications, abstracts

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content93

                See all similar

                Most referenced authors98

                See all reference authors