3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How Social Experience and Environment Impacts Behavioural Plasticity in Drosophila

      review-article
      a , b , a , c
      Fly
      Taylor & Francis
      Social environment, Drosophila, behaviour, plasticity, development, ecology, evolution, model organism

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          An organism’s behaviour is influenced by its social environment. Experiences such as social isolation or crowding may have profound short or long-term effects on an individual’s behaviour. The composition of the social environment also depends on the genetics and previous experiences of the individuals present, leading to additional potential outcomes from each social interaction. In this article, we review selected literature related to the social environment of the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, and how Drosophila respond to variation in their social experiences throughout their lifetimes. We focus on the effects of social environment on behavioural phenotypes such as courtship, aggression, and group dynamics, as well as other phenotypes such as development and physiology. The consequences of phenotypic plasticity due to social environment are discussed with respect to the ecology and evolution of Drosophila. We also relate these studies to laboratory research practices involving Drosophila and other animals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references153

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Human aggression.

          Research on human aggression has progressed to a point at which a unifying framework is needed. Major domain-limited theories of aggression include cognitive neoassociation, social learning, social interaction, script, and excitation transfer theories. Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression. The review also organizes recent theories of the development and persistence of aggressive personality. Personality is conceptualized as a set of stable knowledge structures that individuals use to interpret events in their social world and to guide their behavior. In addition to organizing what is already known about human aggression, this review, using the GAM framework, also serves the heuristic function of suggesting what research is needed to fill in theoretical gaps and can be used to create and test interventions for reducing aggression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The evolution of eusociality.

            Eusociality, in which some individuals reduce their own lifetime reproductive potential to raise the offspring of others, underlies the most advanced forms of social organization and the ecologically dominant role of social insects and humans. For the past four decades kin selection theory, based on the concept of inclusive fitness, has been the major theoretical attempt to explain the evolution of eusociality. Here we show the limitations of this approach. We argue that standard natural selection theory in the context of precise models of population structure represents a simpler and superior approach, allows the evaluation of multiple competing hypotheses, and provides an exact framework for interpreting empirical observations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The heat-shock proteins.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Fly (Austin)
                Fly (Austin)
                Fly
                Taylor & Francis
                1933-6934
                1933-6942
                2 December 2021
                2022
                2 December 2021
                : 16
                : 1
                : 68-84
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto; , Ontario, Canada
                [b ]Current Affiliation: Department of Biology, University of Waterloo; , Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Canada
                [c ]Child and Brain Development Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR); , Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8, Canada
                Author notes
                CONTACT Marla B. Sokolowski marla.sokolowski@ 123456utoronto.ca Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-8007
                Article
                1989248
                10.1080/19336934.2021.1989248
                9718549
                34852730
                8172e63c-4452-49d5-b09e-cd55c5cc8d7a
                © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, References: 135, Pages: 17
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                Molecular biology
                social environment,drosophila,behaviour,plasticity,development,ecology,evolution,model organism

                Comments

                Comment on this article