133
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Exact timing is essential for functional MRI data analysis. Datasets are commonly measured using repeated 2D imaging methods, resulting in a temporal offset between slices. To compensate for this timing difference, slice-timing correction (i.e. temporal data interpolation) has been used as an fMRI pre-processing step for more than fifteen years. However, there has been an ongoing debate about the effectiveness and applicability of this method. This paper presents the first elaborated analysis of the impact of the slice-timing effect on simulated data for different fMRI paradigms and measurement parameters, taking into account data noise and smoothing effects. Here we show, depending on repetition time and paradigm design, slice-timing effects can significantly impair fMRI results and slice-timing correction methods can successfully compensate for these effects and therefore increase the robustness of the data analysis. In addition, our results from simulated data were supported by empirical in vivo datasets. Our findings suggest that slice-timing correction should be included in the fMRI pre-processing pipeline.

          Highlights

          ► Slice acquisition delays can degrade sensitivity of fMRI data analysis. ► Slice-timing correction during pre-processing suppresses estimator bias. ► Our findings based on extensive simulations are supported by in vivo data.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second.

          Progress has recently been made in implementing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques that can be used to obtain images in a fraction of a second rather than in minutes. Echo-planar imaging (EPI) uses only one nuclear spin excitation per image and lends itself to a variety of critical medical and scientific applications. Among these are evaluation of cardiac function in real time, mapping of water diffusion and temperature in tissue, mapping of organ blood pool and perfusion, functional imaging of the central nervous system, depiction of blood and cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics, and movie imaging of the mobile fetus in utero. Through shortened patient examination times, higher patient throughput, and lower cost per MRI examination, EPI may become a powerful tool for early diagnosis of some common and potentially treatable diseases such as ischemic heart disease, stroke, and cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms.

            Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are often analyzed using the general linear model employing a hypothesized neural model convolved with a hemodynamic response function. Mismatches between this hemodynamic model and the data can be induced by spatially varying delays or slice-timing differences. It is common practice to desensitize the analysis to such delays by incorporation of the hemodynamic model plus its temporal derivative. The rationale often used is that additional variance will be captured and regressed out from the data. Though this is true, it ignores the potential for amplitude bias induced by small model mismatches due to, for example, variable hemodynamic delays and is not helpful for "random effects" analyses which typically do not account for the first level variance at all. Amplitude bias is due to the use of only the nonderivative portion of the model in the final test for significant amplitudes. We propose instead testing an amplitude value that is a function of both the nonderivative and the derivative terms of the model. Using simulations, we show that the proposed amplitude test does not suffer from delay-induced bias and that a model incorporating temporal derivatives is a more natural test for amplitude differences. The proposed test is applied in a random-effects analysis of 100 subjects. It reveals increased amplitudes in areas consistent with the task, with the largest increases in regions with greater hemodynamic delays.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations.

              We introduce a new method for detecting differences in the latency of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses to brief events within the context of the General Linear Model. Using a first-order Taylor approximation in terms of the temporal derivative of a canonical hemodynamic response function, statistical parametric maps of differential latencies were estimated via the ratio of derivative to canonical parameter estimates. This method was applied to two example datasets: comparison of words versus nonwords in a lexical decision task and initial versus repeated presentations of faces in a fame-judgment task. Tests across subjects revealed both magnitude and latency differences within several brain regions. This approach offers a computationally efficient means of detecting BOLD latency differences over the whole brain. Precise characterization of the hemodynamic latency and its interpretation in terms of underlying neural differences remain problematic, however.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neuroimage
                Neuroimage
                Neuroimage
                Academic Press
                1053-8119
                1095-9572
                15 September 2011
                15 September 2011
                : 58
                : 2-2
                : 588-594
                Affiliations
                [a ]MR Centre of Excellence, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                [b ]Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                [c ]Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
                [d ]School of Psychology & Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: MR Centre of Excellence, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Fax: + 43 1 40400 7631. christian.windischberger@ 123456meduniwien.ac.at
                Article
                YNIMG8460
                10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078
                3167249
                21757015
                812df409-d9dd-4728-8736-acf413fa63bd
                © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 7 March 2011
                : 23 June 2011
                : 24 June 2011
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                analysis,slice-timing correction,pre-processing,functional mri
                Neurosciences
                analysis, slice-timing correction, pre-processing, functional mri

                Comments

                Comment on this article