33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
6 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Development of a pre-adolescent inter-generational intervention to address HIV and obesity using intervention mapping

      1 , 1 , 1 , 2
      Health Education Journal
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          South Africa has a high prevalence of HIV and obesity. Interventions to date have primarily focused on adolescents and adults. Prevention of obesity, in particular, is not addressed substantively in the current pre-adolescent school curriculum. Education about factors underlying these issues early in life could reach beyond children, to their parents.

          Objective:

          We aimed to increase awareness about HIV and obesity/underweight risks and prevention through the development of a combined intervention delivered directly to pre-adolescent learners and indirectly to their parents, for immediate- and long-term benefits.

          Design:

          Scoping review and needs assessment.

          Setting:

          Five government-run primary schools in a district in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

          Method:

          Five of the six-step intervention mapping protocol guided intervention development: (1) a formative study, comprising a scoping review and needs assessment; (2) definition of programme objectives; (3) selection of theory-based intervention methods; (4) programme development and (5) adoption, implementation and sustainability planning.

          Results:

          Educators perceived that health and lifestyle issues among learners affected classroom learning and saw a need for school-based health curricula. They highlighted that HIV was an issue in their communities and that malnutrition was a concern in rural schools. The scoping review shortlisted 11 evidence-based practices which informed the design. Intervention components comprised a learning curriculum, environmental support and activity-based constituents that targeted the learner in the school environment and the parent in the home environment. The intervention was designed to increase knowledge about HIV and nutrition, enhance skills and strengthen autonomous self-efficacy in communication. Accompanying resources were designed, and implementation strategies were developed.

          Conclusion:

          The scoping review and the needs assessment informed intervention development as well as critical adaptations. In particular, stakeholder engagement guided the tailoring of the intervention to fit the target populations and context.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

            Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

              Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Health Education Journal
                Health Education Journal
                SAGE Publications
                0017-8969
                1748-8176
                December 2020
                July 10 2020
                December 2020
                : 79
                : 8
                : 932-947
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [2 ]UCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
                Article
                10.1177/0017896920937042
                8106aae1-ef9b-465d-8616-6f588844e630
                © 2020

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                5
                1
                4
                0
                Smart Citations
                5
                1
                4
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content71

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors1,213