8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Frontal pathways in cognitive control: direct evidence from intraoperative stimulation and diffusion tractography

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          See Voets and Plaha (doi: [Related article:]10.1093/brain/awz197) for a scientific commentary on this article.

          Puglisi & Howells et al. investigate the white matter pathways that subserve cognitive control using a combination of lesion-symptom analysis, diffusion tractography, and intraoperative brain mapping during the Stroop test in glioma patients. The results reveal critical involvement of inferior cortico-striatal connections, emphasising the importance of their preservation during frontal tumour resection.

          Abstract

          A key aspect of cognitive control is the management of conflicting incoming information to achieve a goal, termed ‘interference control’. Although the role of the right frontal lobe in interference control is evident, the white matter tracts subserving this cognitive process remain unclear. To investigate this, we studied the effect of transient network disruption (by means of direct electrical stimulation) and permanent disconnection (resulting from neurosurgical resection) on interference control processes, using the Stroop test in the intraoperative and extraoperative neurosurgical setting. We evaluated the sites at which errors could be produced by direct electrical stimulation during an intraoperative Stroop test in 34 patients with frontal right hemisphere glioma. Lesion-symptom mapping was used to evaluate the relationship between the resection cavities and postoperative performance on the Stroop test of this group compared with an additional 29 control patients who did not perform the intraoperative test (63 patients in total aged 17–77 years; 28 female). We then examined tract disruption and disconnection in a subset of eight patients who underwent both the intraoperative Stroop test and high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) tractography. The results showed that, intraoperatively, the majority of sites associated with errors during Stroop test performance and concurrent subcortical stimulation clustered in a region of white matter medial to the right inferior frontal gyrus, lateral and superior to the striatum. Patients who underwent the intraoperative test maintained cognitive control ability at the 1-month follow-up ( P = 0.003). Lesion-symptom analysis showed resection of the right inferior frontal gyrus was associated with slower postoperative Stroop test ability (corrected for multiple comparisons, 5000 permutations). The stimulation sites associated with intraoperative errors most commonly corresponded with the inferior fronto-striatal tracts and anterior thalamic radiation (over 75% of patients), although the latter was commonly resected without postoperative deficits on the Stroop test (in 60% of patients). Our results show converging evidence to support a critical role for the inferior frontal gyrus in interference control processes. The intraoperative data combined with tractography suggests that cortico-subcortical tracts, over cortico-cortical connections, may be vital in maintaining efficiency of cognitive control processes. This suggests the importance of their preservation during resection of right frontal tumours.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Executive Functions

          Executive functions (EFs) make possible mentally playing with ideas; taking the time to think before acting; meeting novel, unanticipated challenges; resisting temptations; and staying focused. Core EFs are inhibition [response inhibition (self-control—resisting temptations and resisting acting impulsively) and interference control (selective attention and cognitive inhibition)], working memory, and cognitive flexibility (including creatively thinking “outside the box,” seeing anything from different perspectives, and quickly and flexibly adapting to changed circumstances). The developmental progression and representative measures of each are discussed. Controversies are addressed (e.g., the relation between EFs and fluid intelligence, self-regulation, executive attention, and effortful control, and the relation between working memory and inhibition and attention). The importance of social, emotional, and physical health for cognitive health is discussed because stress, lack of sleep, loneliness, or lack of exercise each impair EFs. That EFs are trainable and can be improved with practice is addressed, including diverse methods tried thus far.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.

            Conflict monitoring by the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has been posited to signal a need for greater cognitive control, producing neural and behavioral adjustments. However, the very occurrence of behavioral adjustments after conflict has been questioned, along with suggestions that there is no direct evidence of ACC conflict-related activity predicting subsequent neural or behavioral adjustments in control. Using the Stroop color-naming task and controlling for repetition effects, we demonstrate that ACC conflict-related activity predicts both greater prefrontal cortex activity and adjustments in behavior, supporting a role of ACC conflict monitoring in the engagement of cognitive control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes.

              Cognitive control supports flexible behavior by selecting actions that are consistent with our goals and appropriate for our environment. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) has an established role in cognitive control, and research on the functional organization of PFC promises to contribute to our understanding of the architecture of control. A recently popular hypothesis is that the rostro-caudal axis of PFC supports a control hierarchy whereby posterior-to-anterior PFC mediates progressively abstract, higher-order control. This review discusses evidence for a rostro-caudal gradient of function in PFC and the theories proposed to account for these results, including domain generality in working memory, relational complexity, the temporal organization of behavior and abstract representational hierarchy. Distinctions among these frameworks are considered as a basis for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain
                Brain
                brainj
                Brain
                Oxford University Press
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                August 2019
                25 July 2019
                25 July 2019
                : 142
                : 8
                : 2451-2465
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Laboratory of Motor Control, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, and Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
                [2 ] Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
                [3 ] Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                [4 ] Natbrainlab, Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Prof. Lorenzo Bello Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano and Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, IRCCS, Milan, Italy E-mail: lorenzo.bello@ 123456unimi.it

                Guglielmo Puglisi and Henrietta Howells authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-1679
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-2822
                Article
                awz178
                10.1093/brain/awz178
                6658848
                31347684
                80d96e8f-ee03-4aa1-a44a-6dd44d4e6088
                © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 14 November 2018
                : 18 April 2019
                : 28 April 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro 10.13039/501100005010
                Funded by: AIRC 10.13039/501100005010
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust Investigator
                Award ID: 103759/Z/14/Z
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Neurosciences
                executive function,direct electrical stimulation,tractography,fronto-striatal,awake neurosurgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article