8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The root‐knot nematode effector MiEFF18 interacts with the plant core spliceosomal protein SmD1 required for giant cell formation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction—the Phobius web server

          When using conventional transmembrane topology and signal peptide predictors, such as TMHMM and SignalP, there is a substantial overlap between these two types of predictions. Applying these methods to five complete proteomes, we found that 30–65% of all predicted signal peptides and 25–35% of all predicted transmembrane topologies overlap. This impairs predictions of 5–10% of the proteome, hence this is an important issue in protein annotation. To address this problem, we previously designed a hidden Markov model, Phobius, that combines transmembrane topology and signal peptide predictions. The method makes an optimal choice between transmembrane segments and signal peptides, and also allows constrained and homology-enriched predictions. We here present a web interface (http://phobius.cgb.ki.se and http://phobius.binf.ku.dk) to access Phobius.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            SUPPA2: fast, accurate, and uncertainty-aware differential splicing analysis across multiple conditions

            Despite the many approaches to study differential splicing from RNA-seq, many challenges remain unsolved, including computing capacity and sequencing depth requirements. Here we present SUPPA2, a new method that addresses these challenges, and enables streamlined analysis across multiple conditions taking into account biological variability. Using experimental and simulated data, we show that SUPPA2 achieves higher accuracy compared to other methods, especially at low sequencing depth and short read length. We use SUPPA2 to identify novel Transformer2-regulated exons, novel microexons induced during differentiation of bipolar neurons, and novel intron retention events during erythroblast differentiation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13059-018-1417-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              RNA Splicing by the Spliceosome

              The spliceosome removes introns from messenger RNA precursors (pre-mRNA). Decades of biochemistry and genetics combined with recent structural studies of the spliceosome have produced a detailed view of the mechanism of splicing. In this review, we aim to make this mechanism understandable and provide several videos of the spliceosome in action to illustrate the intricate choreography of splicing. The U1 and U2 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) mark an intron and recruit the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP. Transfer of the 5′ splice site (5′SS) from U1 to U6 snRNA triggers unwinding of U6 snRNA from U4 snRNA. U6 folds with U2 snRNA into an RNA-based active site that positions the 5′SS at two catalytic metal ions. The branch point (BP) adenosine attacks the 5′SS, producing a free 5′ exon. Removal of the BP adenosine from the active site allows the 3′SS to bind, so that the 5′ exon attacks the 3′SS to produce mature mRNA and an excised lariat intron. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Biochemistry, Volume 89 is June 22, 2020. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                New Phytologist
                New Phytol
                Wiley
                0028-646X
                1469-8137
                March 2021
                December 09 2020
                March 2021
                : 229
                : 6
                : 3408-3423
                Affiliations
                [1 ]INRAE Université Côte d’AzurCNRSISA Sophia AntipolisF‐06903France
                [2 ]Institute of Plant Sciences Paris‐Saclay (IPS2) CNRSINRAUniversités Paris Saclay ‐ EvryUniversité de Paris Gif sur Yvette91192France
                [3 ]Graduate School of Science and Technology Kumamoto University Kumamoto860‐11 8555Japan
                [4 ]Department of Plant Pathology and Key Laboratory of Pest Monitoring and Green Management of the Ministry of Agriculture China Agricultural University Beijing100193China
                [5 ]Institut Jean‐Pierre Bourgin INRAEAgroParisTechUniversité Paris‐Saclay Versailles78000France
                Article
                10.1111/nph.17089
                33206370
                80cab518-ddf1-4d51-920d-f5ac91372898
                © 2021

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article