15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although codes of conduct, guidelines and standards call for healthcare practitioners to protect patients’ dignity, there are widespread concerns about a lack of attention to the dignity of older people who need assistance with toileting, incontinence or bladder or bowel care in health or social care settings that provide long-term care. Incontinence and care dependence threatens patient dignity. The aim of this research was to explore, describe and explain the concept of dignity as it relates to continence care for older people requiring long-term care.

          Methods

          The first four steps of Rodgers evolutionary method of concept analysis were followed. First, a comprehensive and systematic search of databases and key guidelines about continence care was undertaken to identify empirical research about dignity and continence care in older people in facilities that provide permanent residential or inpatient care of older people for day-to-day living. Data were extracted on the authors, date, sample, country of origin, and key definitions, attributes, contexts and consequences from each included record. Findings were inductively analysed and grouped according to whether they were the key attributes and antecedents of dignity in relation to continence care or the consequences of undignified continence care.

          Results

          Of 625 articles identified, 18 were included in the final analysis. Fifty individual attributes were identified that were categorised in 6 domains (respect, empathy, trust, privacy, autonomy and communication). A further 15 were identified that related to the environment (6 physical and 9 social). Key consequences of undignified continence care were also identified and categorised into 3 levels of impact (resident/family member, staff or organisation).

          Conclusions

          This research resulted in a conceptual understanding of dignity that can be used as a value or guiding principle in an ethic of care for older people who need assistance with toileting, incontinence or bladder or bowel care in long-term care settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Fundamentals of Person-Centered Care for Individuals With Dementia

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Dignity is a useless concept.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.ostaszkiewicz@nari.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                29 July 2020
                29 July 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 266
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1021.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research – Barwon Health Partnership, Institute for Healthcare Transformation, , Deakin University, ; Geelong, VIC 3220 Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1021.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, School of Nursing and Midwifery, , Deakin University, ; Gheringhap St, Geelong, VIC 3220 Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.429568.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0382 5980, National Ageing Research Institute, ; P.O Box 2127, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 21, Melbourne, VIC 3530 Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.1021.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research – Monash Health Partnership, Institute for Healthcare Transformation, , Deakin University, ; Burwood, VIC 3125 Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, Alberta Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-4493
                Article
                1673
                10.1186/s12877-020-01673-x
                7392826
                32727481
                80937231-01ef-4007-aa33-fc0c92327074
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 20 April 2020
                : 23 July 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Bladder Foundation
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Geriatric medicine
                dignity,continence care,concept analysis,person-centred care,dignity-protective continence care,long-term care

                Comments

                Comment on this article