21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Feasibility and acceptability of two incentive-based implementation strategies for mental health therapists implementing cognitive-behavioral therapy: a pilot study to inform a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Informed by our prior work indicating that therapists do not feel recognized or rewarded for implementation of evidence-based practices, we tested the feasibility and acceptability of two incentive-based implementation strategies that seek to improve therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth, an evidence-based practice.

          Methods

          This study was conducted over 6 weeks in two community mental health agencies with therapists ( n = 11) and leaders ( n = 4). Therapists were randomized to receive either a financial or social incentive if they achieved a predetermined criterion on adherence to cognitive-behavioral therapy. In the first intervention period (block 1; 2 weeks), therapists received the reward they were initially randomized to if they achieved criterion. In the second intervention period (block 2; 2 weeks), therapists received both rewards if they achieved criterion. Therapists recorded 41 sessions across 15 unique clients over the project period. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility was assessed quantitatively. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with therapists and leaders to assess acceptability. Difference in therapist adherence by condition was examined as an exploratory outcome. Adherence ratings were ascertained using an established and validated observational coding system of cognitive-behavioral therapy.

          Results

          Both implementation strategies were feasible and acceptable—however, modifications to study design for the larger trial will be necessary based on participant feedback. With respect to our exploratory analysis, we found a trend suggesting the financial reward may have had a more robust effect on therapist adherence than the social reward.

          Conclusions

          Incentive-based implementation strategies can be feasibly administered in community mental health agencies with good acceptability, although iterative pilot work is essential. Larger, fully powered trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of implementation strategies to incentivize and enhance therapists’ adherence to evidence-based practices such as cognitive-behavioral therapy.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0684-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.

          Efforts to identify, develop, refine, and test strategies to disseminate and implement evidence-based treatments have been prioritized in order to improve the quality of health and mental health care delivery. However, this task is complicated by an implementation science literature characterized by inconsistent language use and inadequate descriptions of implementation strategies. This article brings more depth and clarity to implementation research and practice by presenting a consolidated compilation of discrete implementation strategies, based on a review of 205 sources published between 1995 and 2011. The resulting compilation includes 68 implementation strategies and definitions, which are grouped according to six key implementation processes: planning, educating, financing, restructuring, managing quality, and attending to the policy context. This consolidated compilation can serve as a reference to stakeholders who wish to implement clinical innovations in health and mental health care and can facilitate the development of multifaceted, multilevel implementation plans that are tailored to local contexts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis.

            More than 4 decades of research and 9 meta-analyses have focused on the undermining effect: namely, the debate over whether the provision of extrinsic incentives erodes intrinsic motivation. This review and meta-analysis builds on such previous reviews by focusing on the interrelationship among intrinsic motivation, extrinsic incentives, and performance, with reference to 2 moderators: performance type (quality vs. quantity) and incentive contingency (directly performance-salient vs. indirectly performance-salient), which have not been systematically reviewed to date. Based on random-effects meta-analytic methods, findings from school, work, and physical domains (k = 183, N = 212,468) indicate that intrinsic motivation is a medium to strong predictor of performance (ρ = .21-45). The importance of intrinsic motivation to performance remained in place whether incentives were presented. In addition, incentive salience influenced the predictive validity of intrinsic motivation for performance: In a "crowding out" fashion, intrinsic motivation was less important to performance when incentives were directly tied to performance and was more important when incentives were indirectly tied to performance. Considered simultaneously through meta-analytic regression, intrinsic motivation predicted more unique variance in quality of performance, whereas incentives were a better predictor of quantity of performance. With respect to performance, incentives and intrinsic motivation are not necessarily antagonistic and are best considered simultaneously. Future research should consider using nonperformance criteria (e.g., well-being, job satisfaction) as well as applying the percent-of-maximum-possible (POMP) method in meta-analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence.

              Efforts to increase the practice of evidence-based psychotherapy in the United States have led to the formation of task forces to define, identify, and disseminate information about empirically supported psychological interventions. The work of several such task forces and other groups reviewing empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in the United States, United Kingdom, and elsewhere is summarized here, along with the lists of treatments that have been identified as ESTs. Also reviewed is the controversy surrounding EST identification and dissemination, including concerns abou research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well as the reliability and transparency of the EST review process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                215-746-1759 , rbeidas@upenn.edu
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                15 December 2017
                15 December 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 148
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8972, GRID grid.25879.31, Department of Psychiatry, , University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, ; 3535 Market Street, 3015, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7822, GRID grid.170205.1, School of Social Service Administration, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8753, GRID grid.137628.9, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, , Weill Cornell School of Medicine, ; New York, USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8972, GRID grid.25879.31, School of Nursing, , University of Pennsylvania, ; Philadelphia, USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8972, GRID grid.25879.31, The Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, , University of Pennsylvania, ; Philadelphia, USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0670 228X, GRID grid.184764.8, School of Social Work, , Boise State University, ; Boise, USA
                [7 ]Hall-Mercer Community Mental Health Center, Philadelphia, USA
                [8 ]The Village, Philadelphia, USA
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8972, GRID grid.25879.31, School of Social Policy and Practice, , University of Pennsylvania, ; Philadelphia, USA
                Article
                684
                10.1186/s13012-017-0684-7
                5732393
                29246236
                806044ae-1dab-4510-aaf0-aa4d61a5a5ba
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 June 2017
                : 27 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: K23MH099179
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: F32MH103960
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, University of Pennsylvania Implementation Science Working Group;
                Award ID: F32MH103955
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Medicine
                evidence-based practices,incentives,behavioral economics,community mental health
                Medicine
                evidence-based practices, incentives, behavioral economics, community mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article