33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bistability in the Rac1, PAK, and RhoA Signaling Network Drives Actin Cytoskeleton Dynamics and Cell Motility Switches

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Dynamic interactions between RhoA and Rac1, members of the Rho small GTPase family, play a vital role in the control of cell migration. Using predictive mathematical modeling, mass spectrometry-based quantitation of network components, and experimental validation in MDA-MB-231 mesenchymal breast cancer cells, we show that a network containing Rac1, RhoA, and PAK family kinases can produce bistable, switch-like responses to a graded PAK inhibition. Using a small chemical inhibitor of PAK, we demonstrate that cellular RhoA and Rac1 activation levels respond in a history-dependent, bistable manner to PAK inhibition. Consequently, we show that downstream signaling, actin dynamics, and cell migration also behave in a bistable fashion, displaying switches and hysteresis in response to PAK inhibition. Our results demonstrate that PAK is a critical component in the Rac1-RhoA inhibitory crosstalk that governs bistable GTPase activity, cell morphology, and cell migration switches.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • RhoA and Rac1 are linked by a double-negative feedback loop

          • A model predicts bistability of the system within a physiological parameter range

          • Rac1 and RhoA activity is bistable in response to PAK inhibition

          • Actin dynamics, cell morphology, and migration show hysteresis upon PAK inhibition

          Abstract

          A mathematical model and experiments demonstrate that RhoA, Rac1, actin dynamics, cell morphology, and migration respond in a bistable manner to perturbations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors.

          Actin stress fibers are one of the major cytoskeletal structures in fibroblasts and are linked to the plasma membrane at focal adhesions. rho, a ras-related GTP-binding protein, rapidly stimulated stress fiber and focal adhesion formation when microinjected into serum-starved Swiss 3T3 cells. Readdition of serum produced a similar response, detectable within 2 min. This activity was due to a lysophospholipid, most likely lysophosphatidic acid, bound to serum albumin. Other growth factors including PDGF induced actin reorganization initially to form membrane ruffles, and later, after 5 to 10 min, stress fibers. For all growth factors tested the stimulation of focal adhesion and stress fiber assembly was inhibited when endogenous rho function was blocked, whereas membrane ruffling was unaffected. These data imply that rho is essential specifically for the coordinated assembly of focal adhesions and stress fibers induced by growth factors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion

            The GTPases Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 act in concert to control cytoskeleton dynamics1-3. Recent biosensor studies have shown that all three GTPases are activated at the front of migrating cells4-7 and biochemical evidence suggests that they may regulate one another: Cdc42 can activate Rac18, and Rac1 and RhoA are mutually inhibitory9-12. However, their spatiotemporal coordination, at the seconds and single micron dimensions typical of individual protrusion events, remains unknown. Here, we examine GTPase coordination both through simultaneous visualization of two GTPase biosensors and using a “computational multiplexing” approach capable of defining the relationships between multiple protein activities visualized in separate experiments. We found that RhoA is activated at the cell edge synchronous with edge advancement, whereas Cdc42 and Rac1 are activated 2 μm behind the edge with a delay of 40 sec. This indicates that Rac1 and RhoA operate antagonistically through spatial separation and precise timing, and that RhoA plays a role in the initial events of protrusion, while Rac1 and Cdc42 activate pathways implicated in reinforcement and stabilization of newly expanded protrusions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Random versus directionally persistent cell migration.

              Directional migration is an important component of cell motility. Although the basic mechanisms of random cell movement are well characterized, no single model explains the complex regulation of directional migration. Multiple factors operate at each step of cell migration to stabilize lamellipodia and maintain directional migration. Factors such as the topography of the extracellular matrix, the cellular polarity machinery, receptor signalling, integrin trafficking, integrin co-receptors and actomyosin contraction converge on regulation of the Rho family of GTPases and the control of lamellipodial protrusions to promote directional migration.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cell Syst
                Cell Syst
                Cell Systems
                Cell Press
                2405-4712
                2405-4720
                27 January 2016
                27 January 2016
                : 2
                : 1
                : 38-48
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
                [2 ]Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
                [3 ]Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
                [4 ]Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia
                [5 ]University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
                [6 ]Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
                [7 ]Co-senior author
                [8 ]School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
                [9 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author lan.k.nguyen@ 123456monash.edu
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author alex.vonkriegsheim@ 123456igmm.ed.ac.uk
                Article
                S2405-4712(16)00004-1
                10.1016/j.cels.2016.01.003
                4802415
                27136688
                80541920-f66d-45fb-ab9a-ce8a821a6f24
                © 2016 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 July 2015
                : 30 November 2015
                : 5 January 2016
                Categories
                Article

                rac1,rhoa,cell motility,pak inhibition,bistable switches,mathematical modeling

                Comments

                Comment on this article