16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Multispecific targeting of glioblastoma with tumor microenvironment-responsive multifunctional engineered NK cells

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive brain cancer and highly resistant to therapy, including immunotherapies. It is able to escape immune recognition due to its high heterogeneity, active immunometabolic suppression, and antigen escape mechanisms. Here, we describe an immunotherapy centered around human natural killer (NK) cells engineered to simultaneously target these pathways of immune resistance. These engineered NK cells are able to block adenosine signaling in GBM via CD73 while avoiding antigen escape. We also uncover the functional cooperation between these cells’ intratumoral infiltration and impaired autophagy in GBM as a powerful approach to traffick NK cells into the GBM niche. This NK cell–based immunotherapy provides opportunities to broaden the breadth and versatility of current therapeutic regimens for GBM.

          Abstract

          Tumor antigen heterogeneity, a severely immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and lymphopenia resulting in inadequate immune intratumoral trafficking, have rendered glioblastoma (GBM) highly resistant to therapy. To address these obstacles, here we describe a unique, sophisticated combinatorial platform for GBM: a cooperative multifunctional immunotherapy based on genetically engineered human natural killer (NK) cells bearing multiple antitumor functions including local tumor responsiveness that addresses key drivers of GBM resistance to therapy: antigen escape, immunometabolic reprogramming of immune responses, and poor immune cell homing. We engineered dual-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) NK cells to bear a third functional moiety that is activated in the GBM TME and addresses immunometabolic suppression of NK cell function: a tumor-specific, locally released antibody fragment which can inhibit the activity of CD73 independently of CAR signaling and decrease the local concentration of adenosine. The multifunctional human NK cells targeted patient-derived GBM xenografts, demonstrated local tumor site–specific activity in the tissue, and potently suppressed adenosine production. We also unveil a complex reorganization of the immunological profile of GBM induced by inhibiting autophagy. Pharmacologic impairment of the autophagic process not only sensitized GBM to antigenic targeting by NK cells but promoted a chemotactic profile favorable to NK infiltration. Taken together, our study demonstrates a promising NK cell–based combinatorial strategy that can target multiple clinically recognized mechanisms of GBM progression simultaneously.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of cDC1 into the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Cancer Immune Control

          Summary Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1) are critical for antitumor immunity, and their abundance within tumors is associated with immune-mediated rejection and the success of immunotherapy. Here, we show that cDC1 accumulation in mouse tumors often depends on natural killer (NK) cells that produce the cDC1 chemoattractants CCL5 and XCL1. Similarly, in human cancers, intratumoral CCL5, XCL1, and XCL2 transcripts closely correlate with gene signatures of both NK cells and cDC1 and are associated with increased overall patient survival. Notably, tumor production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) leads to evasion of the NK cell-cDC1 axis in part by impairing NK cell viability and chemokine production, as well as by causing downregulation of chemokine receptor expression in cDC1. Our findings reveal a cellular and molecular checkpoint for intratumoral cDC1 recruitment that is targeted by tumor-derived PGE2 for immune evasion and that could be exploited for cancer therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regression of Glioblastoma after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.

            A patient with recurrent multifocal glioblastoma received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells targeting the tumor-associated antigen interleukin-13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13Rα2). Multiple infusions of CAR T cells were administered over 220 days through two intracranial delivery routes - infusions into the resected tumor cavity followed by infusions into the ventricular system. Intracranial infusions of IL13Rα2-targeted CAR T cells were not associated with any toxic effects of grade 3 or higher. After CAR T-cell treatment, regression of all intracranial and spinal tumors was observed, along with corresponding increases in levels of cytokines and immune cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. This clinical response continued for 7.5 months after the initiation of CAR T-cell therapy. (Funded by Gateway for Cancer Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02208362 .).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of glioblastoma: State of the art and future directions

              Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Overall, the prognosis for patients with this disease is poor, with a median survival of <2 years. There is a slight predominance in males, and incidence increases with age. The standard approach to therapy in the newly diagnosed setting includes surgery followed by concurrent radiotherapy with temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. Tumor-treating fields, delivering low-intensity alternating electric fields, can also be given concurrently with adjuvant temozolomide. At recurrence, there is no standard of care; however, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy with chemotherapy or bevacizumab are all potential options, depending on the patient's circumstances. Supportive and palliative care remain important considerations throughout the disease course in the multimodality approach to management. The recently revised classification of glioblastoma based on molecular profiling, notably isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, is a result of enhanced understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of disease. There is a clear need for better therapeutic options, and there have been substantial efforts exploring immunotherapy and precision oncology approaches. In contrast to other solid tumors, however, biological factors, such as the blood-brain barrier and the unique tumor and immune microenvironment, represent significant challenges in the development of novel therapies. Innovative clinical trial designs with biomarker-enrichment strategies are needed to ultimately improve the outcome of patients with glioblastoma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                November 09 2021
                November 05 2021
                November 09 2021
                : 118
                : 45
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907;
                [2 ]Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907;
                [3 ]Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907;
                [4 ]Histology Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907;
                [5 ]Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202;
                [6 ]In Vivo Therapeutics Core, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202;
                [7 ]Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202;
                [8 ]Department of Pediatrics, Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202;
                [9 ]Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202;
                [10 ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202;
                [11 ]Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202
                Article
                10.1073/pnas.2107507118
                34740973
                7fe022f0-2134-42e3-9a50-15ff77992bb2
                © 2021

                Free to read

                https://www.pnas.org/site/aboutpnas/licenses.xhtml

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article