97
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

      Preprint
      ,   , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We describe likelihood-based statistical tests for use in high energy physics for the discovery of new phenomena and for construction of confidence intervals on model parameters. We focus on the properties of the test procedures that allow one to account for systematic uncertainties. Explicit formulae for the asymptotic distributions of test statistics are derived using results of Wilks and Wald. We motivate and justify the use of a representative data set, called the "Asimov data set", which provides a simple method to obtain the median experimental sensitivity of a search or measurement as well as fluctuations about this expectation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Tests of Statistical Hypotheses Concerning Several Parameters When the Number of Observations is Large

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Evaluation of three methods for calculating statistical significance when incorporating a systematic uncertainty into a test of the background-only hypothesis for a Poisson process

            Hypothesis tests for the presence of new sources of Poisson counts amidst background processes are frequently performed in high energy physics (HEP), gamma ray astronomy (GRA), and other branches of science. While there are conceptual issues already when the mean rate of background is precisely known, the issues are even more difficult when the mean background rate has non-negligible uncertainty. After describing a variety of methods to be found in the HEP and GRA literature, we consider in detail three classes of algorithms and evaluate them over a wide range of parameter space, by the criterion of how close the ensemble-average Type I error rate (rejection of the background-only hypothesis when it is true) compares with the nominal significance level given by the algorithm. We recommend wider use of an algorithm firmly grounded in frequentist tests of the ratio of Poisson means, although for very low counts the over-coverage can be severe due to the effect of discreteness. We extend the studies of Cranmer, who found that a popular Bayesian-frequentist hybrid can undercover severely when taken to high Z values. We also examine the profile likelihood method, which has long been used in GRA and HEP; it provides an excellent approximation in much of the parameter space, as previously studied by Rolke and collaborators.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              2010-07-10
              2013-06-24
              Article
              10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0
              1007.1727
              7fb6c744-a7ba-4089-8d82-343779b6f432

              http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

              History
              Custom metadata
              Eur.Phys.J.C71:1554,2011
              fixed typo in equations 75 & 76
              physics.data-an hep-ex

              High energy & Particle physics,Mathematical & Computational physics
              High energy & Particle physics, Mathematical & Computational physics

              Comments

              Comment on this article