42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      IOM Committee Members Respond to Endocrine Society Vitamin D Guideline

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In early 2011, a committee convened by the Institute of Medicine issued a report on the Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. The Endocrine Society Task Force in July 2011 published a guideline for the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency. Although these reports are intended for different purposes, the disagreements concerning the nature of the available data and the resulting conclusions have caused confusion for clinicians, researchers, and the public. In this commentary, members of the Institute of Medicine committee respond to aspects of The Endocrine Society guideline that are not well supported and in need of reconsideration. These concerns focus on target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, the definition of vitamin D deficiency, and the question of who constitutes a population at risk vs. the general population.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Clin Endocrinol Metab
          J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab
          jcem
          jceme
          jcem
          The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
          Endocrine Society (Chevy Chase, MD )
          0021-972X
          1945-7197
          April 1, 2012
          22 March 2012
          : 97
          : 4
          : 1146-1152
          Affiliations
          Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Scarbrough, Maine 04074; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030; State University of New York at Stony Brook and Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York, 11501; Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853; The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210; Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois 60153; Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68131; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California 92161; Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6; Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3V6; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut 06520; The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901; and Office of Dietary Supplements (C.L.T.), The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
          Author notes
          Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Clifford Rosen, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, 81 Research Drive, Scarborough, Maine 04074. E-mail: crofen@ 123456gmail.com .
          Article
          PMC5393439 PMC5393439 5393439 11-2218
          10.1210/jc.2011-2218
          5393439
          22442278
          7f457e44-604f-46ce-af2f-baeafb8ea499
          Copyright © 2012 by The Endocrine Society
          History
          : 3 August 2011
          : 10 February 2012
          Categories
          CA, Cardiac Radiology
          Special Features - Controversy in Clinical Endocrinology
          Special Features

          Comments

          Comment on this article