3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dyadic effects of perceived stress, relationship satisfaction and distress disclosure on emotional distress in colorectal cancer patients and their family caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          This study adopted a dyadic analysis method to examine the effect of perceived stress on emotional distress and determine whether relationship satisfaction and distress disclosure act as mediators in colorectal cancer (CRC) enterostomy patient-caregiver dyads.

          Methods

          A total of 312 patient-caregiver dyads completed measures assessing perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, and emotional distress. The data were analyzed using the actor-partner interdependence mediation model.

          Results

          This study found that the perceived stress of patients and caregivers both had direct and indirect actor effects on emotional distress (through relationship satisfaction). Another important finding is that perceived stress had indirect actor-partner effects (through distress disclosure) on emotional distress.

          Conclusions

          This study highlights that perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, and distress disclosure of patients and their caregivers are key factors that can be considered for improving emotional distress. It also partially confirmed the interdependence of patients with CRC and their caregivers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

          Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A global measure of perceived stress.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale.

              The purpose of this study was to review articles related to the psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Systematic literature searches of computerized databases were performed to identify articles on psychometric evaluation of the PSS. The search finally identified 19 articles. Internal consistency reliability, factorial validity, and hypothesis validity of the PSS were well reported. However, the test-retest reliability and criterion validity were relatively rarely evaluated. In general, the psychometric properties of the 10-item PSS were found to be superior to those of the 14-item PSS, while those of the 4-item scale fared the worst. The psychometric properties of the PSS have been evaluated empirically mostly using populations of college students or workers. Overall, the PSS is an easy-to-use questionnaire with established acceptable psychometric properties. However, future studies should evaluate these psychometric properties in greater depth, and validate the scale using diverse populations. Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
                Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
                Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
                Elsevier
                2347-5625
                2349-6673
                29 August 2024
                October 2024
                29 August 2024
                : 11
                : 10
                : 100580
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Nursing Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
                [b ]Hunan Cancer Hospital & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
                [c ]Tianjin People's Hospital, Tianjin, China
                [d ]The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
                [e ]Xiangya School of Nursing of Central South University, Changsha, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. alisaflower@ 123456163.com
                Article
                S2347-5625(24)00202-6 100580
                10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100580
                11440261
                39351017
                7eff3f4f-336e-4645-82bd-eb6aaca2a18b
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 17 June 2024
                : 21 August 2024
                Categories
                Original Article

                colorectal neoplasms,caregivers,emotions,interpersonal relations,self disclosure,models, psychological

                Comments

                Comment on this article