9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Interindividual differences in stress sensitivity: basal and stress-induced cortisol levels differentially predict neural vigilance processing under stress

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stress exposure is known to precipitate psychological disorders. However, large differences exist in how individuals respond to stressful situations. A major marker for stress sensitivity is hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA)-axis function. Here, we studied how interindividual variance in both basal cortisol levels and stress-induced cortisol responses predicts differences in neural vigilance processing during stress exposure. Implementing a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, 120 healthy male participants were exposed to a stress-induction and control procedure, followed by an emotional perception task (viewing fearful and happy faces) during fMRI scanning. Stress sensitivity was assessed using physiological (salivary cortisol levels) and psychological measures (trait questionnaires). High stress-induced cortisol responses were associated with increased stress sensitivity as assessed by psychological questionnaires, a stronger stress-induced increase in medial temporal activity and greater differential amygdala responses to fearful as opposed to happy faces under control conditions. In contrast, high basal cortisol levels were related to relative stress resilience as reflected by higher extraversion scores, a lower stress-induced increase in amygdala activity and enhanced differential processing of fearful compared with happy faces under stress. These findings seem to reflect a critical role for HPA-axis signaling in stress coping; higher basal levels indicate stress resilience, whereas higher cortisol responsivity to stress might facilitate recovery in those individuals prone to react sensitively to stress.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci
          Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci
          scan
          scan
          Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
          Oxford University Press
          1749-5016
          1749-5024
          April 2016
          14 December 2015
          : 11
          : 4
          : 663-673
          Affiliations
          1Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
          2Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
          3Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1070 AW Amsterdam, The Netherlands
          Author notes
          Correspondence should be addressed to Marloes J.A.G. Henckens, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail: marloes.henckens@ 123456radboudumc.nl .
          Article
          PMC4814795 PMC4814795 4814795 nsv149
          10.1093/scan/nsv149
          4814795
          26668010
          7e441ac9-67d3-4d21-984e-7aa9aceb0d7e
          © The Author (2015). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
          History
          : 31 August 2015
          : 2 December 2015
          : 2 December 2015
          Page count
          Pages: 11
          Categories
          Original Articles

          stress,amygdala,cortisol,neural vigilance,interindividual differences

          Comments

          Comment on this article