5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Published Research on COVID-19 in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Bibliometric Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to unprecedented global research activity. The Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) continues to contribute to COVID-19 research driven by the unique challenges of the region, including the protracted conflicts, already stressed health systems, and serious health and social inequalities.

          Objective

          This study aims to provide an overview of the publication activities and trends in COVID-19 research in the EMR from the onset of the disease to early 2022 using bibliometric methods.

          Methods

          A literature search using Scopus was conducted from December 1, 2019, to January 31, 2022, using keywords relevant to COVID-19 and the World Health Organization (WHO) EMR country list. Data were exported and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and the Citation Overview function on Scopus. The quality of journals was determined using SCImago Journal Rank and CiteScore. VOSviewer software was used to visualize the relationships between authors, countries, and key terms used in the retrieved documents.

          Results

          A total of 6880 documents were retrieved, of which 1805 (26.24%) were from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and 1782 (25.90%) from Iran, followed by Pakistan, Egypt, and Jordan. Most published documents were affiliated with EMR universities, primarily the Tehran University of Medical Sciences in Iran and King Saud University in KSA (396/6880, 5.76%, and 370/6880, 5.4%, respectively), while only 407 (5.92%) of 6880 documents were associated with universities outside the EMR. For most of the identified publications (5020/6880, 72.97%), no funding source was reported, while King Saud University contributed the largest share (282/1860, 15.16%) of funded publications. Retrieved documents were cited 53,516 times, with an average of 7.78 (SD 34.30). Iran was the EMR country with the most links to other countries (77 links and total link strength of 1279). The 5 authors with the most publications were from KSA, Qatar, and Jordan. There were 290 high-frequency keywords that occurred ≥10 times and were linked in 7 different clusters. The cluster with the most linked keywords was related to epidemiology and mortality. Recent topics included vaccines, vaccination, machine learning, and online learning.

          Conclusions

          This is the first study to show trends in and project future developments of COVID-19 research activity in the EMR. Authors and institutions who led research on COVID-19 in the region were from Iran and KSA. There were multiple regional collaborative efforts; however, international collaboration was limited. Recently, interest has been shifting toward topics related to vaccination, machine learning, and online learning. Understanding the current state of research is instrumental to future research production, and our study will inform regional research initiatives on emerging concepts, as well as opportunities for collaboration and funding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.

          The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. We compared the content coverage and practical utility of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information on the range of journals covered, search facilities and restrictions, and update frequency. We used the example of a keyword search to evaluate the usefulness of these databases in biomedical information retrieval and a specific published article to evaluate their utility in performing citation analysis. All databases were practical in use and offered numerous search facilities. PubMed and Google Scholar are accessed for free. The keyword search with PubMed offers optimal update frequency and includes online early articles; other databases can rate articles by number of citations, as an index of importance. For citation analysis, Scopus offers about 20% more coverage than Web of Science, whereas Google Scholar offers results of inconsistent accuracy. PubMed remains an optimal tool in biomedical electronic research. Scopus covers a wider journal range, of help both in keyword searching and citation analysis, but it is currently limited to recent articles (published after 1995) compared with Web of Science. Google Scholar, as for the Web in general, can help in the retrieval of even the most obscure information but its use is marred by inadequate, less often updated, citation information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Investigating the Emerging COVID-19 Research Trends in the Field of Business and Management: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach

              The COVID-19 pandemic has been labeled as a black swan event that caused a ripple effect on every aspect of human life. Despite the short time span of the pandemic—only four and half months so far—a rather large volume of research pertaining to COVID-19 has been published (107 articles indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science). This article presents the findings of a bibliometric study of COVID-19 literature in the business and management domain to identify current areas of research and propose a way forward. The analysis of the published literature identified four main research themes and 18 sub-themes. The findings and propositions of this study suggest that COVID-19 will be the catalyst of several long- and short-term policy changes and requires the theoretical and empirical attention of researchers. The offered propositions will act as a roadmap to potential research opportunities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Interact J Med Res
                Interact J Med Res
                IJMR
                Interactive Journal of Medical Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-073X
                Jul-Dec 2022
                19 July 2022
                19 July 2022
                : 11
                : 2
                : e38935
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Global Health Development| Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network Amman Jordan
                [2 ] Public Health Department Faculty of Medicine Cairo University Cairo Egypt
                [3 ] Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development Leeds Institute of Health Sciences University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom
                [4 ] Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine Jordan University of Science and Technology Irbid Jordan
                [5 ] Department of Life Sciences School of Public Health Imperial College London London United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Randa K Saad randaksaad@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-6858
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6172-6898
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6190-6912
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-2011
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-1611
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-6857
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-2355
                Article
                v11i2e38935
                10.2196/38935
                9384956
                35852846
                7dee5f77-d01f-43b2-8453-fb590583eca4
                ©Randa K Saad, Sara Abu Khudair, Maha El Rabbat, Mayeh Omar, Mohannad Al Nsour, Yousef Khader, Salman Rawaf. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 19.07.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 22 April 2022
                : 11 June 2022
                : 14 June 2022
                : 21 June 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                covid-19,eastern mediterranean region,bibliometric analysis,literature,research,health care system,social inequality,epidemiology,depression,research trend,bibliometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article