10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing the scopes of practice of geriatric-focused physicians in Canada: a qualitative study of core competencies

      research-article
      , BSc , , MSc MD, , MSc MD, , PhD, , MSc, , MScN RN, , PhD, , PhD
      CMAJ Open
      CMA Impact Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Given long-standing deficits of medical expertise to care for a growing population of older adults, it is important to understand the geriatric medical workforce. We aimed to describe and compare the scopes of practice of the 3 geriatric-focused physician providers in Canada (i.e., family physicians with certification in Care of the Elderly [FM-COE], geriatricians and geriatric psychiatrists).

          Methods:

          We conducted a qualitative study to compare competencies across geriatric-focused physician provider types in Canada, using a directed content analysis approach. We identified and obtained relevant publicly available documents that described the competencies required for certification by searching the websites of The College of Family Physicians of Canada and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada between June 2 and July 31, 2020. An inductive content analysis was used to compare content within each CanMEDS Role according to the CanMEDS Framework.

          Results:

          We identified and obtained 4 relevant publicly available documents describing the competencies required for geriatric-focused certification for the 3 geriatric-focused physician provider types. We found substantial overlaps in the expected medical expertise of FM-COE and geriatricians. The few substantive differences across providers may result from different priorities about which competencies were made explicit for providers. The focused nature of mental health care is apparent in several competencies unique to geriatric psychiatry.

          Interpretation:

          This work highlights substantial overlaps in the scopes of practice for FM-COE and geriatricians. Our findings may encourage efforts to develop more robust delineations between the scopes of practice of these related professionals to facilitate inter-specialty collaboration to lead to more equitable and accessible medical care for older adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              SRQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CMAJ Open
                CMAJ Open
                cmajo
                cmajo
                CMAJ Open
                CMA Impact Inc.
                2291-0026
                Apr-Jun 2022
                21 June 2022
                : 10
                : 2
                : E563-E569
                Affiliations
                Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Correia, Jabbar, Hogeveen, Dash, Mowbray, Costa), and Big Data and Geriatric Models of Care Cluster (Correia, Jabbar, Hogeveen, Dash, Mowbray, Costa) and Department of Family Medicine (Siu, Vanstone), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Rebecca Correia, correirh@ 123456mcmaster.ca
                Article
                cmajo.20210193
                10.9778/cmajo.20210193
                9343128
                35728839
                7dd3b2c8-4f75-4530-99de-10c4adcbb1f8
                © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                Categories
                Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article