4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Lower Prevalence of Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Employed Mothers: Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey in Naivasha, Kenya

      abstract

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          We compared the prevalence of exclusive (EBF) and continued breastfeeding (BF) among formally employed, informally/self-employed, and non-employed mothers in Naivasha, Kenya, where the commercial agriculture and hospitality industries employ many women.

          Methods

          We conducted a cross-sectional survey from Sept. 2018 to Oct. 2019. Mothers of infants presenting to 3 health facilities were asked about their BF status and reasons for EBF cessation at four postpartum points: prior to discharge ( n = 296), 6-weeks ( n = 298), 14-weeks ( n = 295), and 36-weeks ( n = 297). BF status at 24-weeks was estimated at the 36-week visit. We used separate multivariable logistic regression models to compare the prevalence of early initiation (within 1-hr of birth) and EBF, between groups at each time-point, controlling for maternal age, education, HIV status, delivery setting, delivery type, and infant morbidity. We collapsed the non-employed, informal and self-employed groups into one category due to a lack of differences between these groups across all analyses.

          Results

          65.6% of those formally employed reported early initiation of BF, compared to 75.6% without formal employment, although differences were not significant in adjusted models [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.35, 1.14]. Upon hospital discharge, >96% in both groups reported practicing EBF. At 6 weeks, EBF prevalence did not significantly differ between mothers with (94.0%) and without formal employment (86.6%), [OR = 2.00, 95% CI = 0.81, 4.95]. By 14-weeks, formally employed mothers had a lower EBF prevalence compared to mothers without formal employment, 47.2% versus 78.8%, [OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.33]. The lower EBF prevalence among formally employed mothers was also observed at 24-weeks (15.8% versus 48.9% [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.33]. At 36-weeks, the prevalence of continued BF was ≥98% in both groups [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.11, 4.89].

          The primary reasons reported for early EBF cessation were return to work (46.5%), belief that it is appropriate to feed other foods based on the child's age (33.5%), and perceived milk insufficiency (13.7%).

          Conclusions

          Formally employed mothers in Kenya experience shorter durations of EBF compared to mothers who are not formally employed by 14-weeks postpartum. These mothers may benefit from additional supports to help prolong the period of EBF.

          Funding Sources

          NIH Fogarty International Center.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Curr Dev Nutr
          Curr Dev Nutr
          cdn
          Current Developments in Nutrition
          Oxford University Press
          2475-2991
          June 2020
          29 May 2020
          : 4
          : Suppl 2 , NUTRITION 2020 LIVE ONLINE Abstracts
          : 1010
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Wheaton College
          [2 ] Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois Chicago
          [3 ] University of Nairobi
          [4 ] University of Washington
          [5 ] Kenya Medical Research Institute
          [6 ] Washington University in St. Louis
          Article
          PMC7259039 PMC7259039 7259039 nzaa054_082
          10.1093/cdn/nzaa054_082
          7259039
          7da6eb13-3971-4a19-a3a4-990032156c49
          Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          Categories
          Maternal, Perinatal and Pediatric Nutrition
          AcademicSubjects/MED00060

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content33