3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recent cover crop adoption is associated with small maize and soybean yield losses in the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cover crops are gaining traction in many agricultural regions, partly driven by increased public subsidies and by private markets for ecosystem services. These payments are motivated by environmental benefits, including improved soil health, reduced erosion, and increased soil organic carbon. However, previous work based on experimental plots or crop modeling indicates cover crops may reduce crop yields. It remains unclear, though, how recent cover crop adoption has affected productivity in commercial agricultural systems. Here we perform the first large‐scale, field‐level analysis of observed yield impacts from cover cropping as implemented across the US Corn Belt. We use validated satellite data products at sub‐field scales to analyze maize and soybean yield outcomes for over 90,000 fields in 2019–2020. Because we lack data on cover crop species or timing, we seek to quantify the yield impacts of cover cropping as currently practiced in aggregate. Using causal forests analysis, we estimate an average maize yield loss of 5.5% on fields where cover crops were used for 3 or more years, compared with fields that did not adopt cover cropping. Maize yield losses were larger on fields with better soil ratings, cooler mid‐season temperatures, and lower spring rainfall. For soybeans, average yield losses were 3.5%, with larger impacts on fields with warmer June temperatures, lower spring and late‐season rainfall, and, to a lesser extent, better soils. Estimated impacts are consistent with multiple mechanisms indicated by experimental and simulation‐based studies, including the effects of cover crops on nitrogen dynamics, water consumption, and soil oxygen depletion. Our results suggest a need to improve cover crop management to reduce yield penalties, and a potential need to target subsidies based on likely yield impacts. Ultimately, avoiding substantial yield penalties is important for realizing widespread adoption and associated benefits for water quality, erosion, soil carbon, and greenhouse gas emissions.

          Abstract

          Cover cropping is increasingly promoted as a way to improve soil health, reduce soil erosion, and increase soil carbon in agricultural fields, but yield impacts at commercial scales are not well quantified. We used satellite‐derived map datasets of cover cropping activity and crop yields to analyze yield impacts from cover cropping as practiced in the US Corn Belt in recent years. We estimated that, on average, cover cropping reduced maize yields by 5.5% and soybeans yields by 3.5%, suggesting a need to improve cover crop management and potentially target subsidies based on likely yield impacts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Random Forests

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jillian.deines@gmail.com
                dlobell@stanford.edu
                Journal
                Glob Chang Biol
                Glob Chang Biol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2486
                GCB
                Global Change Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                08 November 2022
                February 2023
                : 29
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/gcb.v29.3 )
                : 794-807
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Earth System Science Stanford University Stanford California USA
                [ 2 ] Center on Food Security and the Environment Stanford University Stanford California USA
                [ 3 ] Agroecosystem Sustainability Center, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment University of Illinois at Urban‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA
                [ 5 ] National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA
                [ 6 ] Department of Environmental, Earth, and Geospatial Sciences North Carolina Central University Durham North Carolina USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jillian M. Deines and David B. Lobell, Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

                Email: jillian.deines@ 123456gmail.com and dlobell@ 123456stanford.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-8765
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-6382
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7185-6824
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7710-8541
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-2023
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-3109
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5969-3476
                Article
                GCB16489 GCB-22-1834
                10.1111/gcb.16489
                10099706
                36345737
                7cf078ce-dcd9-4697-8150-0f1ddba2cbfd
                © 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 09 April 2022
                : 30 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 2, Pages: 14, Words: 8836
                Funding
                Funded by: NASA Applied Sciences
                Award ID: 54308‐Z6059203
                Award ID: 80NSSC17K0652
                Funded by: USDA NIFA , doi 10.13039/100005825;
                Award ID: AG 2018‐68002‐27961
                Funded by: Stanford Undergraduate Research in Geoscience and Engineering Program
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:13.04.2023

                agronomy,causal forests,conservation agriculture,cover crop,crop yields,remote sensing

                Comments

                Comment on this article