30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nephrologists' Perspectives on Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment and Palliative Care at End of Life: A Questionnaire Survey in Korea.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Nephrologists commonly engage in decision making regarding the withholding or withdrawal of dialysis and palliative care in patients at end of life (EoL). However, these issues remain an unsolved dilemma for nephrologists. Objective: To explore nephrologists' perceptions on the decision-making process about withholding or withdrawing dialysis and palliative care in Korea. Design: A nationwide 25-item questionnaire online survey via e-mail. Setting/Subjects: A total of 369 Korean nephrologists completed the survey. Results: The proportions of respondents who stated that withholding or withdrawing dialysis at EoL is ethically appropriate were 87.3% and 86.2%, respectively. A total of 72.4% respondents thought that withdrawal of dialysis in a maintenance dialysis patient is ethically appropriate. Responses regarding patient features that should be considered to withhold or withdraw dialysis were as follows: dialysis intolerance (84.3%), poor performance status (74.8%), patient's active request (47.2%), age (28.7%), very severe dementia (27.1%), and several comorbidities (16.5%). Among those nephrologists who responded to the question about the minimum age, at which dialysis should be withheld or withdrawn, most specified an age between 80 and 90 years (94.3%). Fifty-eight percent of respondents stated that terminally ill dialysis patients should be allowed to use palliative care facilities. In addition, a number of nephrologists thought that adequate palliative care facilities, specific treatment guidelines, enough time to manage patients, financial support, and adequate medical experts are necessary. Conclusions: Korean nephrologists thought that withholding or withdrawing dialysis at EoL is ethically appropriate, even in maintenance dialysis patients. Therefore, consensus guidelines for palliative care after withholding or withdrawal of dialysis are needed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Palliat Med
          Journal of palliative medicine
          Mary Ann Liebert Inc
          1557-7740
          1557-7740
          April 2021
          : 24
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
          [2 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
          [3 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
          [4 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
          [5 ] Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
          [6 ] Gwangmyeong Soo Clinic Center, Gwangmyeong, Republic of Korea.
          [7 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
          Article
          10.1089/jpm.2020.0248
          32996855
          7cbbe1ae-76db-41e8-bb63-871d23d20a6e
          History

          dialysis,end of life,palliative care,withdrawal,withhold
          dialysis, end of life, palliative care, withdrawal, withhold

          Comments

          Comment on this article