Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Half-body MRI volumetry of abdominal adipose tissue in patients with obesity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent the whole volumes of abdominal subcutaneous (ASAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) of patients with obesity can be predicted by using data of one body half only. Such a workaround has already been reported for dual-energy x-ray absorption (DEXA) scans and becomes feasible whenever the field of view of an imaging technique is not large enough.

          Methods

          Full-body abdominal MRI data of 26 patients from an obesity treatment center (13 females and 13 males, BMI range 30.8–41.2 kg/m 2, 32.6–61.5 years old) were used as reference (REF). MRI was performed with IRB approval on a clinical 1.5 T MRI (Achieva dStream, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands). Segmentation of adipose tissue was performed with a custom-made Matlab software tool. Statistical measures of agreement were the coefficient of determination R 2 of a linear fit.

          Results

          Mean ASAT REF was 12,976 (7812–24,161) cm 3 and mean VAT REF was 4068 (1137–7518) cm 3. Mean half-body volumes relative to the whole-body values were 50.8% (48.2–53.7%) for ASAT L and 49.2% (46.3–51.8%) for ASAT R. Corresponding volume fractions were 56.4% (51.4–65.9%) for VAT L and 43.6% (34.1–48.6%) for VAT R. Correlations of ASAT REF with ASAT L as well as with ASAT R were both excellent ( R 2 > 0.99, p < 0.01). Corresponding correlations of VAT REF were marginally lower ( R 2 = 0.98 for VAT L, p < 0.01, and R 2 = 0.97 for VAT R, p < 0.01).

          Conclusions

          In conclusion, abdominal fat volumes can be reliably assessed by half-body MRI data, in particular the subcutaneous fat compartment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Current body composition measurement techniques.

          The current article reviews the most innovative and precise, available methods for quantification of in-vivo human body composition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Agreement Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements and Pathologist-Assigned Steatosis Grades of Liver Biopsies From Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

            We assessed the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in grading hepatic steatosis and change in hepatic steatosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in a multi-center study, using central histology as reference.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese individuals.

              Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides precise measurements of body composition in humans. Because its use in obese subjects is limited by the size of the scanning area, we explored the possibility of estimating whole-body composition from DXA half-body scans. Body composition of 183 subjects with a wide range of body sizes [body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) of 17.7 - 52.8] was assessed by DXA and hydrodensitometry. Subjects fitting in the DXA scanning area (group A, n = 156) were scanned once whereas subjects exceeding it (group B, n = 27) were scanned twice, once for each side of the body. When body-composition results for the right and left sides were compared, only minimal differences between the two sides of the body were found in both groups. Least-squares-regression analysis of whole-body composition by hydrodensitometry on DXA gave the following results: percent body fat, r2 = 0.89 (SEE = 4.1%); fat-free mass, r2 = 0.89 (SEE = 3.72 kg); and fat mass, r2 = 0.95 (SEE = 3.57 kg). Similar r2 values and SEEs were obtained for percent body fat when only results from DXA half-body scans of all subjects were considered: right side, r2 = 0.90 (SEE = 4.1%); and left side, r2 = 0.89 (SEE = 4.2%). The error in predicting body composition by hydrodensitometry from DXA whole- or half-body scans was not affected by the subject's body size and/or scanning technique. In conclusion, our results indicate that half-body scan values by DXA accurately predict whole-body composition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49 (341) 97-17400 , nicolas.linder@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
                Journal
                BMC Med Imaging
                BMC Med Imaging
                BMC Medical Imaging
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2342
                22 October 2019
                22 October 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 80
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8517 9062, GRID grid.411339.d, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, , Leipzig University Hospital, ; Leipzig, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2230 9752, GRID grid.9647.c, Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) AdiposityDiseases, , Leipzig University Medical Center, ; Leipzig, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2230 9752, GRID grid.9647.c, Department of Medicine, Endocrinology and Nephrology, , Leipzig University, ; Leipzig, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2816-8158
                Article
                383
                10.1186/s12880-019-0383-8
                6805599
                31640589
                7c6d5bf5-56c9-47b4-abfe-b03f271b2195
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 30 April 2019
                : 27 September 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig
                Award ID: IN-1260910
                Categories
                Technical Advance
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Radiology & Imaging
                magnetic resonance imaging,adipose tissue,quantification,segmentation,volumetry,obesity

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content332

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors248