12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hair analysis for beta‐blockers and calcium‐channel blockers by using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry as a tool for monitoring adherence to antihypertensive therapy

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adherence to therapy is the key to a successful therapeutic intervention, especially in cardiovascular diseases in which a lack of adherence may have serious consequences in terms morbidity and/or mortality. In this context, hair analysis can be an excellent tool to monitor adherence to therapy. Indeed, drugs present in blood are incorporated into the hair matrix, where drugs and metabolites can stay unaltered for a long time protected from metabolism and degradation. In the present study, a simple, specific, and sensitive ultra‐high performance liquid‐chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐MS/MS) method set up to determine in human hair seven beta‐blockers (viz., metoprolol, sotalol, labetalol, atenolol, nebivolol, bisoprolol, and nadolol) and two calcium‐channel blockers (lercanidipine and amlodipine), which are widely prescribed to treat medium‐to‐severe hypertensive conditions. The optimized method was successfully validated in terms of accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, matrix effect and extraction recovery. Moreover, the applicability of the method was evaluated by analyzing 34 real samples of hair obtained from patients under long‐term therapy with calcium channel blockers and beta‐blockers.

          Abstract

          The present work aimed at verifying the possibility to use liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to quantitatively determine antihypertensive drugs in the hair of subjects undergoing chronic treatments. The study includes seven beta‐blockers (viz., atenolol, bisoprolol, labetalol, metoprolol, sotalol, nebivolol, and nadolol) and two calcium channel blockers (amlodipine and lercanidipine). The practical applicability of the method was also verified by analyzing 34 authentic hair samples collected from subjects under chronic therapy with those cardiovascular drugs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS.

          In recent years, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) detection has been demonstrated to be a powerful technique for the quantitative determination of drugs and metabolites in biological fluids. However, the common and early perception that utilization of HPLC-MS/MS practically guarantees selectivity is being challenged by a number of reported examples of lack of selectivity due to ion suppression or enhancement caused by the sample matrix and interferences from metabolites. In light of these serious method liabilities, questions about how to develop and validate reliable HPLC-MS/MS methods, especially for supporting long-term human pharmacokinetic studies, are being raised. The central issue is what experiments, in addition to the validation data usually provided for the conventional bioanalytical methods, need to be conducted to confirm HPLC-MS/MS assay selectivity and reliability. The current regulatory requirements include the need for the assessment and elimination of the matrix effect in the bioanalytical methods, but the experimental procedures necessary to assess the matrix effect are not detailed. Practical, experimental approaches for studying, identifying, and eliminating the effect of matrix on the results of quantitative analyses by HPLC-MS/MS are described in this paper. Using as an example a set of validation experiments performed for one of our investigational new drug candidates, the concepts of the quantitative assessment of the "absolute" versus "relative" matrix effect are introduced. In addition, experiments for the determination of, the "true" recovery of analytes using HPLC-MS/MS are described eliminating the uncertainty about the effect of matrix on the determination of this commonly measured method parameter. Determination of the matrix effect allows the assessment of the reliability and selectivity of an existing HPLC-MS/MS method. If the results of these studies are not satisfactory, the parameters determined may provide a guide to what changes in the method need to be made to improve assay selectivity. In addition, a direct comparison of the extent of the matrix effect using two different interfaces (a heated nebulizer, HN, and ion spray, ISP) under otherwise the same sample preparation and chromatographic conditions was made. It was demonstrated that, for the investigational drug under study, the matrix effect was clearly observed when ISP interface was utilized but it was absent when the HN interface was employed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            An overview of the common methods used to measure treatment adherence

            Background and aims The success of a treatment depends on the effectiveness of the medication regimen, provided that patients take the medicines as prescribed. A low rate of adherence in chronic conditions is associated with poor outcome and decreased quality of life, which constitutes an additional burden for the healthcare systems. To correctly identify the dimension of this problem may be a challenge, as there are numerous methods, definitions, patient settings and factors, each with their specific roles. Our aim was to give an appropriate overview of the most common validated methods that can be used to identify non-adherent patients. Methods This overview is based on an online search of PubMed database and includes the relevant articles in this field. Results We included both direct and indirect methods for measuring treatment adherence and presented concise information that can help researchers and clinicians when choosing an appropriate method. Both subjective and objective methods have advantages and disadvantages that should be fully understood and taken into consideration. Conclusions Choosing a simple, accurate and inexpensive method that can give supplementary information about the patterns, beliefs and barriers of adherence would be desirable. But because this perfect method to measure treatment adherence does not exist, the best solution seems to be the combined use of at least two methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of variations in growth rate and sample collection on interpreting results of segmental analyses of hair.

              Segmental analysis of hair for drugs, metabolites, and poisons has been widely reported in the scientific literature over the past two decades. Two fundamental assumptions in interpreting results of such analyses are (1) an average linear growth rate of head hair of 1cm/month and (2) that sample collections occur with the hair being cut directly next to the scalp. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variability associated with growth rate of human head hair, as well as the ability to uniformly collect hair next to the scalp. The results were used to determine how these factors affect the interpretation of results generated in segmental analysis of hair. A thorough literature review was conducted to assess the range of linear growth of human head hair from the vertex posterior and occipital regions. The results were compiled to establish the average (1.06cm/month), as well as the range of possible growth rates of head hair. The range was remarkable and suggests that conclusions based on the 1-cm/month growth rate could be significantly skewed. A separate study was undertaken to evaluate collection of hair next to the scalp. Fourteen individuals were provided oral instructions, as well as a written standard collection procedure for head hair. The experience levels among the collectors varied from novice to expert. Each individual collected hair from dolls with short- and long-hair. Immediately following each collection, the sampling area was evaluated to determine how close to the scalp the cuts were made, as well as the variability in the lengths of hair remaining at the sampled area. From our collection study, we determined that 0.8±0.1cm of hair was left on the scalp after cutting. When taking into account the amount of hair left on the scalp after collecting, the use of a growth rate of 1.06cm/month, and the assumption that it takes two weeks for newly formed hair in the follicle to reach the scalp, we find that the first 1-cm segment of hair typically corresponds to hair formed 1.3±0.2 to 2.2±0.4 months (95% confidence) earlier. The impact of these findings as it relates to the corresponding time for each additional segment is demonstrated. As a result, we recommend that hair collection be delayed 8 weeks after a suspected ingestion to ensure that the sample fully represents the exposure period. The results of this study suggest that the variability in the growth rate of human head hair, as well as the inconsistent collection of hair, significantly affect the interpretation of results from segmental analysis of hair. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rossella.gottardo@univr.it
                Journal
                Drug Test Anal
                Drug Test Anal
                10.1002/(ISSN)1942-7611
                DTA
                Drug Testing and Analysis
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1942-7603
                1942-7611
                21 July 2022
                October 2022
                : 14
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1002/dta.v14.10 )
                : 1773-1778
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Unit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health University of Verona Verona Italy
                [ 2 ] World‐Class Research Center “Digital biodesign and personalized healthcare” Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Rossella Gottardo, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Unit of Forensic Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10‐37134 Verona, Italy.

                Email: rossella.gottardo@ 123456univr.it

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4728-6686
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5997-1723
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-9128
                Article
                DTA3346
                10.1002/dta.3346
                9796502
                35855505
                7c625612-209e-4f35-8ab3-3a29ed64e721
                © 2022 The Authors. Drug Testing and Analysis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 07 July 2022
                : 16 March 2022
                : 11 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Pages: 6, Words: 3620
                Categories
                Short Communication
                Short Communications
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:28.12.2022

                adherence to therapy,beta‐blockers,calcium channel‐blockers,hair analysis,mass spectrometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article