98
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
7 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Parental Burnout Across the Globe During the COVID-19 Pandemic

      research-article
      1 , * , , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 3 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 11 , 22 , 23 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 23 , 20 , 28 , 29 , 21 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 9 , 35 , 26 , 36 , 36 , 9 , 7 , 37 , 38 , 30 , 40 , 10 , 3 , 11 , 40 , 40
      International Perspectives in Psychology
      Hogrefe Publishing
      prevalence, COVID-19, parental burnout, culture, indulgence

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all societies worldwide. The heightened levels of stress that accompanied the crisis were also expected to affect parenting in many families. Since it is known that high levels of stress in the parenting domain can lead to a condition that has severe consequences for health and well-being, we examined whether the prevalence of parental burnout in 26 countries (9,923 parents; 75% mothers; mean age 40) increased during COVID-19 compared to few years before the pandemic. In most (but not all) countries, analyses showed a significant increase in the prevalence of parental burnout during the pandemic. The results further revealed that next to governmental measures (e.g., number of days locked down, homeschooling) and factors at the individual and family level (e.g., gender, number of children), parents in less (vs. more) indulgent countries suffered more from parental burnout. The findings suggest that stricter norms regarding their parenting roles and duties in general and during the pandemic in particular might have increased their levels of parental burnout.

          Impact and Implications.

          The results of this unique international study by the International Investigation of Parental Burnout – which includes Western and non-Western countries across the globe – point to the importance of considering parental burnout as a syndrome helping to meet specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Of all the potentially modifiable influences affecting individuals’ healthy lives and well-being across the life course (i.e., SDG 3), positive parenting in the early years has the potential to become a common pathway – by fostering social and emotional skills – to promote a range of healthy outcomes in both children and adults. Acknowledging that parenting can be extremely demanding and exhausting for parents who are confronted with specific individual-, family-, and country-level characteristics may give rise to develop programs how to encourage parents to minimize exhaustion in their parenting role and how to adopt nonviolent ways of disciplining children (SDG 16.2). The various individual and cultural factors as well as COVID-19 factors that have been found related to prevalence rates of parental burnout give indications with factors need to be addressed to promote health and well-being of parents and children (SDG 3) and to diminish or prevent violence against children (SDG 16.2).

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Parents' Stress and Children's Psychological Problems in Families Facing the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy

          Objectives: The present study aimed to explore the effect of risk factors associated with the COVID-19 outbreak experience on parents' and children's well-being. Methods: Parents of children aged between 2- and 14-years-old completed an online survey reporting their home environment conditions, any relation they had to the pandemic consequences, their difficulties experienced due to the quarantine, their perception of individual and parent-child dyadic stress, and their children's emotional and behavioral problems. Results: Results showed that the perception of the difficulty of quarantine is a crucial factor that undermines both parents' and children's well-being. Quarantine's impact on children's behavioral and emotional problems is mediated by parent's individual and dyadic stress, with a stronger effect from the latter. Parents who reported more difficulties in dealing with quarantine show more stress. This, in turn, increases the children's problems. Living in a more at-risk area, the quality of the home environment, or the relation they have with the pandemic consequences, do not have an effect on families' well-being. Conclusions: Dealing with quarantine is a particularly stressful experience for parents who must balance personal life, work, and raising children, being left alone without other resources. This situation puts parents at a higher risk of experiencing distress, potentially impairing their ability to be supportive caregivers. The lack of support these children receive in such a difficult moment may be the reason for their more pronounced psychological symptoms. Policies should take into consideration the implications of the lockdown for families' mental health, and supportive interventions for the immediate and for the future should be promoted.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Fitting autoregressive models for prediction

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Initial Challenges of Caregiving During COVID-19: Caregiver Burden, Mental Health, and the Parent–Child Relationship

              Research confirms that the mental health burdens following community-wide disasters are extensive, with pervasive impacts noted in individuals and families. It is clear that child disaster outcomes are worst among children of highly distressed caregivers, or those caregivers who experience their own negative mental health outcomes from the disaster. The current study used path analysis to examine concurrent patterns of parents’ (n = 420) experience from a national sample during the early months of the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic. The results of a multi-group path analysis, organized by parent gender, indicate good fit to the data [X2(10) = 159.04, p < .01]. Results indicate significant linkages between parents’ caregiver burden, mental health, and perceptions of children’s stress; these in turn are significantly linked to child-parent closeness and conflict, indicating possible spillover effects for depressed parents and compensatory effects for anxious parents. The impact of millions of families sheltering in place during the COVID-19 pandemic for an undefined period of time may lead to unprecedented impacts on individuals’ mental health with unknown impacts on child-parent relationships. These impacts may be heightened for families whose caregivers experience increased mental health symptoms, as was the case for fathers in the current sample.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                ipp
                International Perspectives in Psychology
                Research, Practice, Consultation
                Hogrefe Publishing
                2157-3883
                2157-3891
                July 20, 2022
                July 2022
                : 11
                : 3 , Special Issue: Psychology and the COVID-19 Pandemic – A Global Perspective
                : 141-152
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [ 2 ]Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [ 3 ]Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
                [ 4 ]Applied Behavior Analysis Department, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA
                [ 5 ]Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
                [ 6 ]Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
                [ 7 ]Department of Psychology, Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [ 8 ]Department of Psychology/Department of Education, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
                [ 9 ]Department of Psychology, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
                [ 10 ]Department of Developmental, Personality & Social Psychology/Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
                [ 11 ]Institute of Psychology, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
                [ 12 ]Department of Psychology, Fudan University, Fudan, China
                [ 13 ]Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Université Paris Cité, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
                [ 14 ]Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN) Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
                [ 15 ]Faculty of Business Administration, Hokkai-Gakuen University, Sapporo, Japan
                [ 16 ]Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
                [ 17 ]Psychology Department, Faculty of Arts, Menoufia University, Egypt
                [ 18 ]Psychology Department, College of Education Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
                [ 19 ]Department of Psychology, HCMC University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
                [ 20 ]Education and Psychotherapy Clinic, Bujumbura, Burundi
                [ 21 ]Department of Psychology, Konrad Lorenz University, Bogota, Colombia
                [ 22 ]Department of Psychology, University of Nimes, Nimes, France
                [ 23 ]Department of Psychology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
                [ 24 ]Carrera de Psicología, Universidad Científica del Sur, University of Lima, Lima, Peru
                [ 25 ]Programa de Investigación Científica e Innovación, Universidad Privada de Tacna, Tacna, Peru
                [ 26 ]Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
                [ 27 ]Department of Psychology, Women Research Center, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
                [ 28 ]Department of Psychology, University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon
                [ 29 ]Department of Psychology, Universidad Santo Tomas, Talca, Chile
                [ 30 ]School of Physical Education & Sport Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
                [ 31 ]School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
                [ 32 ]Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
                [ 33 ]School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
                [ 34 ]Department of Psychology, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                [ 35 ]Institute of Psychology, Education and Human Development, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay
                [ 36 ]Faculty of Health Sciences, Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania
                [ 37 ]Faculty of Health, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [ 38 ]Department of Psychology, SWSP University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
                [ 39 ]Department of Psychology, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [ 40 ]Psychological Sciences Research Institute Catholic, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
                Author notes
                Hedwig J. A. van Bakel, Department of TRANZO, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands, H.J.A.vanBakel@ 123456tilburguniversity.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9224-5261
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-3069
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-8308
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-4913
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2275-1756
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-4914
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7882-219X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-6736
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-7570
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4721-0251
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-567X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-4480
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-9479
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-4975
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-558X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-1358
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2833-5174
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0529-8323
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-892X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6655-7376
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8618-6069
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-5396
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-1068
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4790-4010
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6756-405X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0952-6522
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-8212
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-8100
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1257-6379
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-7327
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5782-0937
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-1767
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-5869
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9746-1505
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9175-4101
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4159-8980
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0971-9236
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3074-0256
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7333-1578
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1449-1133
                Article
                ipp_11_3_141
                10.1027/2157-3891/a000050
                7c34f611-87b4-49c4-9177-4ae26c2e9138
                Copyright @ 2022
                History
                : July 15, 2021
                : May 8, 2022
                : May 9, 2022
                Funding
                Funding: This research was supported by Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Grants Corona: Fast-track granted to the first author (NOW 440.20.034).
                Categories
                Article

                Sociology,Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Political science,Psychology,General behavioral science,Public health
                COVID-19,prevalence,indulgence,parental burnout,culture

                Comments

                Comment on this article