16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Genetic diversity and structure of the Australian flora

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

          Understanding the ecological consequences of biodiversity is a fundamental challenge. Research on a key component of biodiversity, genetic diversity, has traditionally focused on its importance in evolutionary processes, but classical studies in evolutionary biology, agronomy and conservation biology indicate that genetic diversity might also have important ecological effects. Our review of the literature reveals significant effects of genetic diversity on ecological processes such as primary productivity, population recovery from disturbance, interspecific competition, community structure, and fluxes of energy and nutrients. Thus, genetic diversity can have important ecological consequences at the population, community and ecosystem levels, and in some cases the effects are comparable in magnitude to the effects of species diversity. However, it is not clear how widely these results apply in nature, as studies to date have been biased towards manipulations of plant clonal diversity, and little is known about the relative importance of genetic diversity vs. other factors that influence ecological processes of interest. Future studies should focus not only on documenting the presence of genetic diversity effects but also on identifying underlying mechanisms and predicting when such effects are likely to occur in nature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants.

            A compilation was made of 307 studies using nuclear DNA markers for evaluating among- and within-population diversity in wild angiosperms and gymnosperms. Estimates derived by the dominantly inherited markers (RAPD, AFLP, ISSR) are very similar and may be directly comparable. STMS analysis yields almost three times higher values for within-population diversity whereas among-population diversity estimates are similar to those derived by the dominantly inherited markers. Number of sampled plants per population and number of scored microsatellite DNA alleles are correlated with some of the population genetics parameters. In addition, maximum geographical distance between sampled populations has a strong positive effect on among-population diversity. As previously verified with allozyme data, RAPD- and STMS-based analyses show that long-lived, outcrossing, late successional taxa retain most of their genetic variability within populations. By contrast, annual, selfing and/or early successional taxa allocate most of the genetic variability among populations. Estimates for among- and within-population diversity, respectively, were negatively correlated. The only major discrepancy between allozymes and STMS on the one hand, and RAPD on the other hand, concerns geographical range; within-population diversity was strongly affected when the former methods were used but not so in the RAPD-based studies. Direct comparisons between the different methods, when applied to the same plant material, indicate large similarities between the dominant markers and somewhat lower similarity with the STMS-based data, presumably due to insufficient number of analysed microsatellite DNA loci in many studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Self Fertilization and Population Variability in the Higher Plants

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diversity and Distributions
                Diversity Distrib.
                Wiley
                13669516
                January 2017
                January 2017
                November 13 2016
                : 23
                : 1
                : 41-52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research; CSIRO National Research Collections Australia; PO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia
                [2 ]Environment Institute; School of Biological Sciences; University of Adelaide; North Terrace SA 5005 Australia
                [3 ]National Herbarium of NSW; Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust; Mrs Macquaries Road Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
                [4 ]School of Science and Health; Western Sydney University; Sydney NSW 2751 Australia
                [5 ]Science and Conservation Division; Department of Parks and Wildlife; Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Perth WA 6983 Australia
                [6 ]Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria; Private Bag 2000 Melbourne Vic. 3141 Australia
                [7 ]Science Directorate, Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority; Fraser Avenue West Perth WA 6005 Australia
                [8 ]School of Plant Biology; The University of Western Australia; Crawley WA 6907 Australia
                [9 ]School of Biological Sciences; University of Tasmania; Hobart Tas. 7001 Australia
                [10 ]Southern Cross Plant Science; Southern Cross University; Lismore NSW 2480 Australia
                Article
                10.1111/ddi.12505
                7c06bad8-e5eb-4490-944a-8cef45e443d5
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article