7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genome-Wide Association and Genomic Prediction of Growth Traits in the European Flat Oyster ( Ostrea edulis)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The European flat oyster ( Ostrea edulis) is a bivalve mollusc that was once widely distributed across Europe and represented an important food resource for humans for centuries. Populations of O. edulis experienced a severe decline across their biogeographic range mainly due to overexploitation and disease outbreaks. To restore the economic and ecological benefits of European flat oyster populations, extensive protection and restoration efforts are in place within Europe. In line with the increasing interest in supporting restoration and oyster farming through the breeding of stocks with enhanced performance, the present study aimed to evaluate the potential of genomic selection for improving growth traits in a European flat oyster population obtained from successive mass-spawning events. Four growth-related traits were evaluated: total weight (TW), shell height (SH), shell width (SW) and shell length (SL). The heritability of the growth traits was in the low-moderate range, with estimates of 0.45, 0.37, 0.22, and 0.32 for TW, SH, SW and SL, respectively. A genome-wide association analysis revealed a largely polygenic architecture for the four growth traits, with two distinct QTLs detected on chromosome 4. To investigate whether genomic selection can be implemented in flat oyster breeding at a reduced cost, the utility of low-density SNP panels was assessed. Genomic prediction accuracies using the full density panel were high (> 0.83 for all traits). The evaluation of the effect of reducing the number of markers used to predict genomic breeding values revealed that similar selection accuracies could be achieved for all traits with 2K SNPs as for a full panel containing 4,577 SNPs. Only slight reductions in accuracies were observed at the lowest SNP density tested (i.e., 100 SNPs), likely due to a high relatedness between individuals being included in the training and validation sets during cross-validation. Overall, our results suggest that the genetic improvement of growth traits in oysters is feasible. Nevertheless, and although low-density SNP panels appear as a promising strategy for applying GS at a reduced cost, additional populations with different degrees of genetic relatedness should be assessed to derive estimates of prediction accuracies to be expected in practical breeding programmes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets

          PLINK 1 is a widely used open-source C/C++ toolset for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and research in population genetics. However, the steady accumulation of data from imputation and whole-genome sequencing studies has exposed a strong need for even faster and more scalable implementations of key functions. In addition, GWAS and population-genetic data now frequently contain probabilistic calls, phase information, and/or multiallelic variants, none of which can be represented by PLINK 1's primary data format. To address these issues, we are developing a second-generation codebase for PLINK. The first major release from this codebase, PLINK 1.9, introduces extensive use of bit-level parallelism, O(sqrt(n))-time/constant-space Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and Fisher's exact tests, and many other algorithmic improvements. In combination, these changes accelerate most operations by 1-4 orders of magnitude, and allow the program to handle datasets too large to fit in RAM. This will be followed by PLINK 2.0, which will introduce (a) a new data format capable of efficiently representing probabilities, phase, and multiallelic variants, and (b) extensions of many functions to account for the new types of information. The second-generation versions of PLINK will offer dramatic improvements in performance and compatibility. For the first time, users without access to high-end computing resources can perform several essential analyses of the feature-rich and very large genetic datasets coming into use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

            P VanRaden (2008)
            Efficient methods for processing genomic data were developed to increase reliability of estimated breeding values and to estimate thousands of marker effects simultaneously. Algorithms were derived and computer programs tested with simulated data for 2,967 bulls and 50,000 markers distributed randomly across 30 chromosomes. Estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients required accurate estimates of allele frequencies in the base population. Linear model predictions of breeding values were computed by 3 equivalent methods: 1) iteration for individual allele effects followed by summation across loci to obtain estimated breeding values, 2) selection index including a genomic relationship matrix, and 3) mixed model equations including the inverse of genomic relationships. A blend of first- and second-order Jacobi iteration using 2 separate relaxation factors converged well for allele frequencies and effects. Reliability of predicted net merit for young bulls was 63% compared with 32% using the traditional relationship matrix. Nonlinear predictions were also computed using iteration on data and nonlinear regression on marker deviations; an additional (about 3%) gain in reliability for young bulls increased average reliability to 66%. Computing times increased linearly with number of genotypes. Estimation of allele frequencies required 2 processor days, and genomic predictions required <1 d per trait, and traits were processed in parallel. Information from genotyping was equivalent to about 20 daughters with phenotypic records. Actual gains may differ because the simulation did not account for linkage disequilibrium in the base population or selection in subsequent generations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps

              Recent advances in molecular genetic techniques will make dense marker maps available and genotyping many individuals for these markers feasible. Here we attempted to estimate the effects of ∼50,000 marker haplotypes simultaneously from a limited number of phenotypic records. A genome of 1000 cM was simulated with a marker spacing of 1 cM. The markers surrounding every 1-cM region were combined into marker haplotypes. Due to finite population size (Ne = 100), the marker haplotypes were in linkage disequilibrium with the QTL located between the markers. Using least squares, all haplotype effects could not be estimated simultaneously. When only the biggest effects were included, they were overestimated and the accuracy of predicting genetic values of the offspring of the recorded animals was only 0.32. Best linear unbiased prediction of haplotype effects assumed equal variances associated to each 1-cM chromosomal segment, which yielded an accuracy of 0.73, although this assumption was far from true. Bayesian methods that assumed a prior distribution of the variance associated with each chromosome segment increased this accuracy to 0.85, even when the prior was not correct. It was concluded that selection on genetic values predicted from markers could substantially increase the rate of genetic gain in animals and plants, especially if combined with reproductive techniques to shorten the generation interval.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Genet.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-8021
                15 July 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 926638
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies , University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [2] 2 Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) , Weymouth Laboratory , Weymouth, United Kingdom
                [3] 3 Institute of Marine Sciences , University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth, United Kingdom
                [4] 4 Blue Marine Foundation , London, United Kingdom
                [5] 5 Ocean and Earth Science , University of Southampton , Southampton, United Kingdom
                [6] 6 College of Life and Environmental Sciences , University of Exeter , Exeter, United Kingdom
                [7] 7 Lochnell Oysters , Oban, United Kingdom
                [8] 8 Benchmark Genetics , Penicuik, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                *Correspondence: Tim P. Bean, tim.bean@ 123456roslin.ed.ac.uk ; Ross D. Houston, ross.houston@ 123456bmkgenetics.com

                This article was submitted to Livestock Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

                Edited by: Nguyen Hong Nguyen, University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia

                Reviewed by: Neil Thompson, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States

                Panya Sae-Lim, MOWI Genetics, Norway

                [ † ]

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                Article
                926638
                10.3389/fgene.2022.926638
                9380691
                35983410
                7bc7e9e1-c05d-4fad-b6a0-dc6e7941f1f5
                Copyright © 2022 Peñaloza, Barria, Papadopoulou, Hooper, Preston, Green, Helmer, Kean-Hammerson, Nascimento-Schulze, Minardi, Gundappa, Macqueen, Hamilton, Houston and Bean.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 April 2022
                : 17 June 2022
                Categories
                Genetics
                Original Research

                Genetics
                ostrea edulis,oyster,gwas,genomic selection,growth,aquaculture
                Genetics
                ostrea edulis, oyster, gwas, genomic selection, growth, aquaculture

                Comments

                Comment on this article