5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge, Practices, and Perceptions of Prediabetes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite strong evidence and national policy supporting type 2 diabetes prevention, little is known about type 2 diabetes prevention in the primary care setting. Our objective was to assess primary care physicians’ knowledge and practice regarding perceived barriers and potential interventions to improving management of prediabetes. Cross-sectional mailed survey. Nationally representative random sample of US primary care physicians (PCPs) identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We assessed PCP knowledge, practice behaviors, and perceptions related to prediabetes. We performed chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to evaluate the association between PCP characteristics and the main survey outcomes. In total, 298 (33%) eligible participants returned the survey. PCPs had limited knowledge of risk factors for prediabetes screening, laboratory diagnostic criteria for prediabetes, and management recommendations for patients with prediabetes. Only 36% of PCPs refer patients to a diabetes prevention lifestyle change program as their initial management approach, while 43% discuss starting metformin for prediabetes. PCPs believed that barriers to type 2 diabetes prevention are both at the individual level (e.g., patients’ lack of motivation) and at the system level (e.g., lack of weight loss resources). PCPs reported that increased access to and insurance coverage of type 2 diabetes prevention programs and coordination of referral of patients to these resources would facilitate type 2 diabetes preventive efforts. Addressing gaps in PCP knowledge may improve the identification and management of people with prediabetes, but system-level changes are necessary to support type 2 diabetes prevention in the primary care setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

          Experts consider health information technology key to improving efficiency and quality of health care. To systematically review evidence on the effect of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of health care. The authors systematically searched the English-language literature indexed in MEDLINE (1995 to January 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and the Periodical Abstracts Database. We also added studies identified by experts up to April 2005. Descriptive and comparative studies and systematic reviews of health information technology. Two reviewers independently extracted information on system capabilities, design, effects on quality, system acquisition, implementation context, and costs. 257 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies addressed decision support systems or electronic health records. Approximately 25% of the studies were from 4 academic institutions that implemented internally developed systems; only 9 studies evaluated multifunctional, commercially developed systems. Three major benefits on quality were demonstrated: increased adherence to guideline-based care, enhanced surveillance and monitoring, and decreased medication errors. The primary domain of improvement was preventive health. The major efficiency benefit shown was decreased utilization of care. Data on another efficiency measure, time utilization, were mixed. Empirical cost data were limited. Available quantitative research was limited and was done by a small number of institutions. Systems were heterogeneous and sometimes incompletely described. Available financial and contextual data were limited. Four benchmark institutions have demonstrated the efficacy of health information technologies in improving quality and efficiency. Whether and how other institutions can achieve similar benefits, and at what costs, are unclear.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Physicians' weight loss counseling in two public hospital primary care clinics.

            Primary care physicians are an important source of information on weight management. Nevertheless, weight loss counseling by these physicians remains inadequate. This study sought to determine physicians' barriers to providing weight loss counseling in a public hospital, patients' recall of physicians' weight loss recommendations, and the influence of physicians' counseling on patients' understanding, motivation, and behavior regarding weight loss. In 2001, four focus groups of faculty and residents were held at two primary care clinics affiliated with the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport to determine the barriers to providing weight loss counseling. Scripted probes were used to uncover consensus norms. In 2001-02, structured exit interviews were conducted with 210 overweight or obese patients recruited from the clinics to determine patients' recall of physicians' weight loss recommendations, and patients' understanding of the relationship between weight and health, and their stages of readiness for weight loss. Physicians identified major barriers to providing weight loss counseling, including insufficient confidence, knowledge, and skills. Obesity was underdocumented as a distinct clinical diagnosis. Only 5% of the patients recalled being given the combined weight loss strategy of diet and exercise. However, patients who recalled being counseled to lose weight were more likely to understand the risks of obesity, the benefits of weight loss, and were at a higher stage of readiness for weight loss. Physicians' weight loss counseling had a significant effect on patients' understanding of and motivation for weight loss. However, physicians provided insufficient guidance on weight management strategies, possibly because of inadequate counseling skills and confidence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physician weight loss advice and patient weight loss behavior change: a literature review and meta-analysis of survey data.

              Primary care providers (PCPs) can empower their patients to make health-promoting behavior changes. Many guidelines recommend that PCPs counsel overweight and obese patients about weight loss, yet few studies examine the impact of provider weight loss counseling on actual changes in patient behavior. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies of survey data examining provider weight loss counseling and its association with changes in patient weight loss behavior. We reviewed the published literature using keywords related to weight loss advice. We used meta-analytic techniques to compute and aggregate effect sizes for the meta-analysis. We also tested variables that had the potential to moderate the responses. A total of 32 studies met criteria for the literature review. Of these, 12 were appropriate for the meta-analysis. Most studies demonstrated a positive effect of provider weight loss advice on patient weight loss behavior. In random effects meta-analysis, the overall mean weighted effect size for patient weight loss efforts was odds ratio (OR)=3.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.71, 5.49; P<0.01), indicating a statistically significant impact of weight loss advice. There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of advice in studies using obese patients alone versus mixed samples (obese alone OR=3.44, 95% CI 2.37, 5.00; mixed sample OR=3.98, 95% CI 2.53, 6.26, P=0.63). PCP advice on weight loss appears to have a significant impact on patient attempts to change behaviors related to their weight. Providers should address weight loss with their overweight and obese patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of General Internal Medicine
                J GEN INTERN MED
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0884-8734
                1525-1497
                September 9 2019
                Article
                10.1007/s11606-019-05245-7
                6848700
                31502095
                7b7ae19e-94b9-48ed-92bd-718a80643007
                © 2019

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article