1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Calibration‐Free Complementary Relationship Estimates Terrestrial Evapotranspiration Globally

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1
      Water Resources Research
      American Geophysical Union (AGU)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While large‐scale terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) information is essential for our understanding of the Earth's water and energy cycles, substantial differences exist in current global ET products due partly to uncertainties in soil‐ and vegetation‐related parameters and/or precipitation forcing. Here a calibration‐free complementary relationship (CR) model, driven purely by routine meteorological forcing (air and dew‐point temperature, wind speed, and net radiation), mainly from ERA5, was employed to estimate global ET rates during 1982–2016. Modeled ET agrees favorably with (a) monthly eddy‐covariance measurements of 129 global FLUXNET sites, and; (b) water‐balance‐derived ET of 52 basins at the multiyear mean and annual scales. Additional evaluations demonstrate that the CR is very competitive, in comparison with other 12 widely used global ET products. The 35‐years mean global land ET rate from the CR is 500 ± 6 mm yr −1 (72.3 ± 0.9 × 10 3 km 3 yr −1) with more than 70% of the land area exhibiting increasing annual ET rates over the study period. Globally, CR ET significantly increased at a rate of 0.31 mm yr −1 during 1982–2016, suggesting a 2.2% increase in global land ET over last 35 years. Model inter‐comparisons indicate that global annual CR ET values and their trend are close to the median of not only the 12 ET products chosen but also that of 20 CMIP6 models. Since this calibration‐free CR model requires no precipitation (except in sea‐shore deserts for a subsequent ET correction), vegetation or soil data, it could be incorporated into complex hydrological and/or climate models, thereby facilitating large‐scale hydrological and climate simulations.

          Key Points

          • A global, 30‐years‐plus complementary relationship evapotranspiration (ET) product is developed and validated at the plot and basin scales

          • This new ET product, derived from a minimal number of inputs without vegetation or soil data, may improve upon previous global ET estimates

          • Global terrestrial ET rates increased significantly during 1982–2016, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere

          Related collections

          Most cited references129

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The ERA5 Global Reanalysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

            By coordinating the design and distribution of global climate model simulations of the past, current, and future climate, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has become one of the foundational elements of climate science. However, the need to address an ever-expanding range of scientific questions arising from more and more research communities has made it necessary to revise the organization of CMIP. After a long and wide community consultation, a new and more federated structure has been put in place. It consists of three major elements: (1) a handful of common experiments, the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima) and CMIP historical simulations (1850–near present) that will maintain continuity and help document basic characteristics of models across different phases of CMIP; (2) common standards, coordination, infrastructure, and documentation that will facilitate the distribution of model outputs and the characterization of the model ensemble; and (3) an ensemble of CMIP-Endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) that will be specific to a particular phase of CMIP (now CMIP6) and that will build on the DECK and CMIP historical simulations to address a large range of specific questions and fill the scientific gaps of the previous CMIP phases. The DECK and CMIP historical simulations, together with the use of CMIP data standards, will be the entry cards for models participating in CMIP. Participation in CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs by individual modelling groups will be at their own discretion and will depend on their scientific interests and priorities. With the Grand Science Challenges of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) as its scientific backdrop, CMIP6 will address three broad questions: – How does the Earth system respond to forcing? – What are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases? – How can we assess future climate changes given internal climate variability, predictability, and uncertainties in scenarios? This CMIP6 overview paper presents the background and rationale for the new structure of CMIP, provides a detailed description of the DECK and CMIP6 historical simulations, and includes a brief introduction to the 21 CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Natural Evaporation from Open Water, Bare Soil and Grass

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Water Resources Research
                Water Resources Research
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                0043-1397
                1944-7973
                September 2021
                September 07 2021
                September 2021
                : 57
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
                [2 ] Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary
                [3 ] Conservation and Survey Division School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Lincoln NE USA
                Article
                10.1029/2021WR029691
                7b71dedb-ba44-46b0-a92c-9c6e9dafcb5b
                © 2021

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article