Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinicians' Perspectives on Negative Effects of Psychological Treatments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Negative effects of psychological treatments is a fairly unexplored area of clinical research. Previous investigations have indicated that a portion of all patients experience negative effects in terms of deterioration and various adverse events. Meanwhile, evidence suggests that many clinicians are untrained in identifying negative effects and unaware of the current research findings. The objective of the current study is thus to investigate clinicians' own perspectives and experiences of possible negative effects of psychological treatments. An invitation to participate in an anonymous online survey consisting of 14 open-ended questions was distributed via three mailing lists used by clinicians that primarily identify themselves as cognitive behavior therapists. The responses were analyzed using a qualitative method based on thematic analysis. In total, 74 participants completed the survey. A majority agreed that negative effects of psychological treatments exist and pose a problem, and many reported having experienced both deterioration and adverse events among patients in their own practice. The thematic analysis resulted in three core themes: characteristics of negative effects, causal factors, as well as methods and criteria for evaluating negative effects. The clinicians recognize that negative effects exist, but many are unaware of the current research findings and are unfamiliar with methods and criteria for identifying and preventing deterioration and adverse events. The results provide evidence for further dissemination of the present knowledge regarding negative effects, particularly during basic clinical training, as well as the need for raising awareness of the available methods for identifying and preventing negative effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Negative effects from psychological treatments: a perspective.

          The author offers a 40-year perspective on the observation and study of negative effects from psychotherapy or psychological treatments. This perspective is placed in the context of the enormous progress in refining methodologies for psychotherapy research over that period of time, resulting in the clear demonstration of positive effects from psychological treatments for many disorders and problems. The study of negative effects--whether due to techniques, client variables, therapist variables, or some combination of these--has not been accorded the same degree of attention. Indeed, methodologies suitable for ascertaining positive effects often obscure negative effects in the absence of specific strategies for explicating these outcomes. Greater emphasis on more individual idiographic approaches to studying the effects of psychological interventions would seem necessary if psychologists are to avoid harming their patients and if they are to better understand the causes of negative or iatrogenic effects from their treatment efforts. This would be best carried out in the context of a strong collaboration among frontline clinicians and clinical scientists. Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The elephant on the couch: side-effects of psychotherapy.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Do we know when our clients get worse? an investigation of therapists' ability to detect negative client change.

              Routine clinical judgment is often relied upon to detect client deterioration. How reliable are therapists' judgments of deterioration? Two related studies were conducted to investigate therapist detection of client deterioration and therapist treatment decisions in situations of deterioration. The first study examined therapists' ability to detect client deterioration through the review of therapy progress notes. Therapist treatment decisions in cases of client deterioration were also explored. Therapists had considerable difficulty recognizing client deterioration, challenging the assumption that routine clinical judgment is sufficient when attempting to detect client deterioration. A second study was a survey of therapists asking how they detect client deterioration and what treatment decisions they make in response. Symptom worsening was the most commonly stated cue of deterioration. 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cogn Behav Ther
                Cogn Behav Ther
                SBEH
                sbeh20
                Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
                Routledge
                1650-6073
                1651-2316
                2 October 2014
                9 September 2014
                : 43
                : 4
                : 319-331
                Affiliations
                [ a ]Division of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University , Stockholm, Sweden
                [ b ]Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University , Linköping, Sweden
                [ c ]Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University , Linköping, Sweden
                [ d ]Division of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [ e ]Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universität Berlin , Germany
                Author notes
                Correspondence address: Per Carlbring, Division of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Frescati Hagväg 8, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden. Tel: +46 8 16 38 71. Fax: +46 8 15 93 42. Email: per@ 123456carlbring.se
                Article
                939593
                10.1080/16506073.2014.939593
                4260663
                25204370
                7b2ca642-c83c-4c65-9fdf-6e93ddfcb1df
                © 2014 The Authors. Published by Taylor and Francis.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                : 14 April 2014
                : 16 June 2014
                : 25 June 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, References: 40, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Articles

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                negative effects,adverse events,cognitive behavior therapy,online survey,thematic analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content221

                Cited by25

                Most referenced authors214