Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

To facilitate the interpretation of empirical results produced by the 15D, a generic, preference-based instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a subjective five-category global assessment scale (GAS) was used as an external anchor to determine the minimum important change (MIC) in the 15D scores.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Qual Life Res

Title: Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation

ISSN (Electronic): 1573-2649

ISSN (Print): 0962-9343

Publication date (Electronic): Mar 2015

Volume: 24

Issue: 3

Affiliations

[1 ] Department of Clinical Nutrition, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, The Hospital District of South Ostrobothnia, Seinäjoki, Finland.

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0787-4

PubMed ID: 25145637

SO-VID: 7ad659be-3832-4f63-af68-7d71383a5b93

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Cited by 93

See all cited by