2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      RNase H1C collaborates with ssDNA binding proteins WHY1/3 and recombinase RecA1 to fulfill the DNA damage repair in Arabidopsis chloroplasts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Proper repair of damaged DNA is crucial for genetic integrity and organismal survival. As semi-autonomous organelles, plastids have their own genomes whose integrity must be preserved. Several factors have been shown to participate in plastid DNA damage repair; however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we elucidate a mechanism of homologous recombination (HR) repair in chloroplasts that involves R-loops. We find that the recombinase RecA1 forms filaments in chloroplasts during HR repair, but aggregates as puncta when RNA:DNA hybrids accumulate. ssDNA-binding proteins WHY1/3 and chloroplast RNase H1 AtRNH1C are recruited to the same genomic sites to promote HR repair. Depletion of AtRNH1C or WHY1/3 significantly suppresses the binding of RNA polymerase to the damaged DNA, thus reducing HR repair and modulating microhomology-mediated double-strand break repair. Furthermore, we show that DNA polymerase IB works with AtRNH1C genetically to complete the DNA damage repair process. This study reveals the positive role of R-loops in facilitating the activities of WHY1/3 and RecA1, which in turn secures HR repair and organellar development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis.

          The transient gene expression system using Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts has proven an important and versatile tool for conducting cell-based experiments using molecular, cellular, biochemical, genetic, genomic and proteomic approaches to analyze the functions of diverse signaling pathways and cellular machineries. A well-established protocol that has been extensively tested and applied in numerous experiments is presented here. The method includes protoplast isolation, PEG-calcium transfection of plasmid DNA and protoplast culture. Physiological responses and high-throughput capability enable facile and cost-effective explorations as well as hypothesis-driven tests. The protoplast isolation and DNA transfection procedures take 6-8 h, and the results can be obtained in 2-24 h. The cell system offers reliable guidelines for further comprehensive analysis of complex regulatory mechanisms in whole-plant physiology, immunity, growth and development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair

            In mammalian cells, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired predominantly by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway, which includes subpathways that can repair different DNA-end configurations. Furthermore, the repair of some DNA-end configurations can be shunted to the auxiliary pathways of alternative end joining (a-EJ) or single-strand annealing (SSA).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells

              The major pathways of DNA double strand break (DSB) repair have key roles in suppressing genomic instability. However, if deployed in an inappropriate cellular context, these same repair functions can mediate chromosome rearrangements that underlie various human diseases, ranging from developmental disorders to cancer. Two major mechanisms of DSB repair predominate in mammalian cells, namely homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. In this Review, we outline a ‘decision tree’ of DSB repair pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells, and consider how DSB repair dysfunction can lead to genomic instability. Stalled or broken replication forks present a distinctive challenge to the DSB repair system. Emerging evidence suggests that the ‘rules’ governing stalled fork repair pathway choice differ from those that operate at a conventional DSB.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Nucleic Acids Res
                Nucleic Acids Res
                nar
                Nucleic Acids Research
                Oxford University Press
                0305-1048
                1362-4962
                09 July 2021
                16 June 2021
                16 June 2021
                : 49
                : 12
                : 6771-6787
                Affiliations
                Center for Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China
                Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences , Beijing 100084, China
                Center for Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China
                Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences , Beijing 100084, China
                Center for Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China
                Center for Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China
                Center for Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China
                Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences , Beijing 100084, China
                Center for Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China
                Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences , Beijing 100084, China
                Author notes
                To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +86 10 62784002; Email: sunqianwen@ 123456mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-5400
                Article
                gkab479
                10.1093/nar/gkab479
                8266629
                34133716
                7a7ee38f-4485-4049-8360-31d7680134f2
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 19 May 2021
                : 25 April 2021
                : 31 December 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Science and Technology of China;
                Award ID: 2016YFA0500800
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, DOI 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 91940306
                Award ID: 91740105
                Award ID: 31822028
                Funded by: Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences;
                Categories
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00010
                Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article