9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of the reinforcing and anxiogenic effects of intravenous cocaine and cocaethylene.

      , , ,
      Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
      American Psychological Association (APA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          People report that ethanol improves the experience produced by cocaine. This effect may be attributable to cocaethylene (CE), a cocaine metabolite formed only in the presence of ethanol. To test this, rats were trained to run an alley for a single intravenous dose of either cocaine (0.5-2.0 mg/kg) or an equimolar dose of CE (0.75-2.88 mg/kg). The rats' start latency and running speed measured the reinforcing effects of the drugs and the number of times rats approached but failed to enter the goal box (i.e., approach-avoidance retreats) indexed anxiety. Rats reinforced with CE had shorter start latencies and faster running speeds and exhibited fewer "retreats" than cocaine-reinforced rats. These results suggest that CE is more reinforcing and less anxiogenic than cocaine and hence may account for the combined effects of cocaine and ethanol in humans.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
          Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
          American Psychological Association (APA)
          1936-2293
          1064-1297
          February 2000
          February 2000
          : 8
          : 1
          : 117-124
          Article
          10.1037/1064-1297.8.1.117
          10743912
          7a7e9930-ea1e-4eca-8d2e-cef459c9fcf1
          © 2000
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article