23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Survey of Chinese Citizens’ Perceptions on Farm Animal Welfare

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Farm animal welfare has been gradually recognized as an important issue in most parts of the world. In China, domestic animals were traditionally raised in backyard and treated as an important component of family wealth. Industrialization of animal production brings forth the farm animal welfare concerns recently in China, yet the modern concept of animal welfare has not been publicized and a comprehensive recognition on how consumers and farmers perceive animal welfare is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a survey on public opinions toward farm animal welfare in China, based on pigs (including sows, piglets, and fattening pigs), domestic fowls (including layers and broilers) and their products. From 6,006 effective questionnaires approximately two thirds of the respondents had never heard of ‘animal welfare’; 72.9% of the respondents claimed that, for the sake of animal derived food safety, human beings should improve the rearing conditions for pigs and domestic fowls; 65.8% of the respondents totally or partly agreed on establishing laws to improve animal welfare; more than half of the respondents were willing, or to some extent willing, to pay more for high-welfare animal products, whereas 45.5% of the respondents were not willing or reluctant to pay more. In summary, farm animal welfare is still in its early stage of development and more efforts are needed to improve the public conception to animal welfare in the process of establishing farm animal welfare standards and legislations in China.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Editor
          Journal
          PLoS One
          PLoS ONE
          plos
          plosone
          PLoS ONE
          Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
          1932-6203
          2014
          14 October 2014
          : 9
          : 10
          : e109177
          Affiliations
          [1 ]History of Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, P.R. China
          [2 ]Department of Sociology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, P.R. China
          [3 ]Department of Laws, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, P.R. China
          [4 ]Philosophy of Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, P.R. China
          [5 ]Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, P.R. China
          Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France
          Author notes

          Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

          Conceived and designed the experiments: XLY YBL MZ HQY RQZ. Performed the experiments: XLY YBL MZ HQY RQZ. Analyzed the data: XLY YBL MZ HQY RQZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XLY YBL MZ HQY RQZ. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: XLY YBL MZ HQY RQZ.

          Article
          PONE-D-14-13029
          10.1371/journal.pone.0109177
          4196765
          25314159
          7a37f476-49b1-4ec2-bf17-e5514ca98a79
          Copyright @ 2014

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

          History
          : 25 March 2014
          : 8 September 2014
          Page count
          Pages: 10
          Funding
          These authors have no support or funding to report.
          Categories
          Research Article
          Social Sciences
          Law and Legal Sciences
          Philosophy
          Sociology
          Custom metadata
          The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper.

          Uncategorized
          Uncategorized

          Comments

          Comment on this article