15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of loss- and restoration-oriented stressors on grief in times of COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to examine the influence of COVID-specific stressors on cross-sectional and longitudinal bereavement outcomes. According to the Dual Process Model of grief these stress-inducing factors can relate to the loss (loss-oriented stressors) or to manage everyday life (restoration-oriented stressors) and require coping in the grief process. A total of 491 participants (94.1% female; 43.92 years on average; 44.4% loss of a parent) were included at the first measurement time point (T0), of whom 99 individuals also participated in a follow-up assessment 6 months later (T1). Participants frequently reported loss-oriented (on average 7.30 out of 21 queried) and restoration-oriented stressors (on average 6.99 out of 19 queried). Cross-sectionally, higher acute grief intensity was associated with a higher number of loss-oriented stressors, poorer mental well-being, and sociodemographic variables. This effect disappeared longitudinally, with only acute grief intensity and poorer mental well-being at T0 predicting higher prolonged grief at T1. Common resilience factors did not buffer the effects of the pandemic on grief. Loss-oriented stressors seem to be especially relevant for understanding grief and might be a mediator of higher long-term grief. The findings suggest that COVID-specific strains need to be specifically taken into account in the support of bereaved individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bad is stronger than good.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back.

              While resilience has been defined as resistance to illness, adaptation, and thriving, the ability to bounce back or recover from stress is closest to its original meaning. Previous resilience measures assess resources that may promote resilience rather than recovery, resistance, adaptation, or thriving. To test a new brief resilience scale. The brief resilience scale (BRS) was created to assess the ability to bounce back or recover from stress. Its psychometric characteristics were examined in four samples, including two student samples and samples with cardiac and chronic pain patients. The BRS was reliable and measured as a unitary construct. It was predictably related to personal characteristics, social relations, coping, and health in all samples. It was negatively related to anxiety, depression, negative affect, and physical symptoms when other resilience measures and optimism, social support, and Type D personality (high negative affect and high social inhibition) were controlled. There were large differences in BRS scores between cardiac patients with and without Type D and women with and without fibromyalgia. The BRS is a reliable means of assessing resilience as the ability to bounce back or recover from stress and may provide unique and important information about people coping with health-related stressors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                s.palm@zpga.landeskrankenhaus.de
                Wuttke_A@ukw.de
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                9 November 2023
                9 November 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 19584
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Mental Health in Old Age (ZpGA), Landeskrankenhaus (AöR), Hartmühlenweg 2-4, 55122 Mainz, Germany
                [2 ]Institute of Psychology, Kiel University, ( https://ror.org/04v76ef78) Grippstraße 2, 24118 Kiel, Germany
                [3 ]Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University, ( https://ror.org/023b0x485) Binger Str. 14-16, 55122 Mainz, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.410607.4, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, , University Medical Center Mainz, ; Untere Zahlbacher Straße 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
                [5 ]Hospital for Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Agaplesion Elisabethenstift, Landgraf-Georg-Str. 100, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
                [6 ]Center for Mental Health, University Hospital Würzburg, ( https://ror.org/03pvr2g57) Margarete-Höppel Platz 1, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-4621
                Article
                46403
                10.1038/s41598-023-46403-6
                10638438
                37949946
                79ff6048-ffb6-4620-a0c7-7f379d3f319b
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 30 May 2023
                : 31 October 2023
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2023

                Uncategorized
                public health,psychology
                Uncategorized
                public health, psychology

                Comments

                Comment on this article