0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Power line fault diagnosis based on convolutional neural networks

      research-article
      a , * , b
      Heliyon
      Elsevier
      CNN, Power lines, Fault location, Fault diagnosis

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With the rapid development of the national economy, power security is very important for the security of the country and people's happiness. Electricity is an important energy source for a country. Even if the power system malfunctions for a short period of time, it would cause incalculable losses to social production and people's lives. Among them, one of the most important reasons for power system faults is the occurrence of power line faults, so diagnosing faulty lines has great research significance. On the basis of analyzing the structure and working principle of the deep learning model convolutional neural network (CNN), this article used the CNN model to diagnose faults in power lines and analyzed the simulation results. It was found that different CNN structures have different fault diagnosis accuracy for power lines. The fewer the number of batches in the network structure and the more the number of training sessions, the higher its fault determination accuracy. In the power line fault diagnosis based on three deep learning algorithms, the CNN has the highest stable fault diagnosis accuracy of 100%; the recursive neural network has the second stable fault diagnosis accuracy of 93.4%; the deep belief network has the lowest stable fault diagnosis accuracy of 91.5%. In the comparison of power line fault diagnosis stability, the accuracy standard deviation of CNN is close to 0, and they are also the most stable in power circuit fault diagnosis. The stability of algorithmic recurrent neural networks is between the two, and the accuracy standard deviation of deep belief networks is 1.84% when trained 12 times. Their fault diagnosis stability is also the worst.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          High Accuracy Real-Time Multi-Gas Identification by a Batch-Uniform Gas Sensor Array and Deep Learning Algorithm.

          Semiconductor metal oxide (SMO) gas sensors are attracting great attention as next-generation environmental monitoring sensors. However, there are limitations to the actual application of SMO gas sensors due to their low selectivity. Although the electronic nose (E-nose) systems based on a sensor array are regarded as a solution for the selectivity issue, poor accuracy caused by the nonuniformity of the fabricated gas sensors and difficulty of real-time gas detection have yet to be resolved. In this study, these problems have been solved by fabricating uniform gas sensor arrays and applying the deep learning algorithm to the data from the sensor arrays. Nanocolumnar films of metal oxides (SnO2, In2O3, WO3, and CuO) with a high batch uniformity deposited through glancing angle deposition were used as the sensing materials. The convolutional neural network (CNN) using the input data as a matrix form was adopted as a learning algorithm, which could conduct pattern recognition of the sensor responses. Finally, real-time selective gas detection for CO, NH3, NO2, CH4, and acetone (C3H6O) gas was achieved (minimum response time of 1, 8, 5, 19, and 2 s, respectively) with an accuracy of 98% by applying preprocessed response data to the CNN.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Development and validation of a supervised deep learning algorithm for automated whole‐slide programmed death‐ligand 1 tumour proportion score assessment in non‐small cell lung cancer

            Aims Immunohistochemical programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) staining to predict responsiveness to immunotherapy in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has several drawbacks: a robust gold standard is lacking, and there is substantial interobserver and intraobserver variance, with up to 20% discordance around cutoff points. The aim of this study was to develop a new deep learning‐based PD‐L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) algorithm, trained and validated on a routine diagnostic dataset of digitised PD‐L1 (22C3, laboratory‐developed test)‐stained samples. Methods and results We designed a fully supervised deep learning algorithm for whole‐slide PD‐L1 assessment, consisting of four sequential convolutional neural networks (CNNs), using aiforia create software. We included 199 whole slide images (WSIs) of ‘routine diagnostic’ histology samples from stage IV NSCLC patients, and trained the algorithm by using a training set of 60 representative cases. We validated the algorithm by comparing the algorithm TPS with the reference score in a held‐out validation set. The algorithm had similar concordance with the reference score (79%) as the pathologists had with one another (75%). The intraclass coefficient was 0.96 and Cohen’s κ coefficient was 0.69 for the algorithm. Around the 1% and 50% cutoff points, concordance was also similar between pathologists and the algorithm. Conclusions We designed a new, deep learning‐based PD‐L1 TPS algorithm that is similarly able to assess PD‐L1 expression in daily routine diagnostic cases as pathologists. Successful validation on routine diagnostic WSIs and detailed visual feedback show that this algorithm meets the requirements for functioning as a ‘scoring assistant’.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Power transformers internal fault diagnosis based on deep convolutional neural networks

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                03 April 2024
                30 April 2024
                03 April 2024
                : 10
                : 8
                : e29021
                Affiliations
                [a ]Tangshan Power Supply Company State Grid Jibei Electric Power Co.Ltd, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China
                [b ]State Grid Hebei Electric Power Liability Company Hada Power, Hada, 056000, Hebei, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. nliang0501@ 123456163.com
                Article
                S2405-8440(24)05052-7 e29021
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29021
                11019159
                38628723
                79bab822-6d66-442a-912e-267e7812647b
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 October 2023
                : 21 February 2024
                : 28 March 2024
                Categories
                Research Article

                cnn,power lines,fault location,fault diagnosis
                cnn, power lines, fault location, fault diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article