Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
139
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Calculating the sample size in scientific studies is one of the critical issues as regards the scientific contribution of the study. The sample size critically affects the hypothesis and the study design, and there is no straightforward way of calculating the effective sample size for reaching an accurate conclusion. Use of a statistically incorrect sample size may lead to inadequate results in both clinical and laboratory studies as well as resulting in time loss, cost, and ethical problems. This review holds two main aims. The first aim is to explain the importance of sample size and its relationship to effect size (ES) and statistical significance. The second aim is to assist researchers planning to perform sample size estimations by suggesting and elucidating available alternative software, guidelines and references that will serve different scientific purposes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0

            Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting is vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings and repeat or build upon the work of other researchers. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) were developed in 2010 to help authors and journals identify the minimum information necessary to report in publications describing in vivo experiments. Despite widespread endorsement by the scientific community, the impact of ARRIVE on the transparency of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. We have revised the ARRIVE guidelines to update them and facilitate their use in practice. The revised guidelines are published alongside this paper. This explanation and elaboration document was developed as part of the revision. It provides further information about each of the 21 items in ARRIVE 2.0, including the rationale and supporting evidence for their inclusion in the guidelines, elaboration of details to report, and examples of good reporting from the published literature. This document also covers advice and best practice in the design and conduct of animal studies to support researchers in improving standards from the start of the experimental design process through to publication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Determining Sample Size for Research Activities

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biochem Med (Zagreb)
                Biochem Med (Zagreb)
                BM
                Biochemia Medica
                Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
                1330-0962
                1846-7482
                15 December 2020
                15 February 2021
                : 31
                : 1
                : 010502
                Affiliations
                [1 ]deptMedical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine , Ankara Medipol University , Ankara, Turkey
                [2 ]Ordu University Training and Research Hospital , Ordu, Turkey
                [3 ]deptDepartment of Medical Biochemistry , Lokman Hekim University School of Medicine , Ankara, Turkey
                [4 ]deptDepartment of Medical Biochemistry , Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University , Istanbul, Turkey
                Author notes
                Article
                bm-31-1-010502
                10.11613/BM.2021.010502
                7745163
                33380887
                79b5a5a3-3eb4-4570-9cd7-3e5b38994749
                Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 June 2020
                : 12 November 2020
                Categories
                Review

                biostatistics,effect size,power analysis,sample size
                biostatistics, effect size, power analysis, sample size

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content217

                Cited by289

                Most referenced authors1,012