19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Qualitative investigation of patient and carer experiences of everyday legal needs towards end of life

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Legal issues are common in chronic illness. These include matters of daily life, such as problems with employment, finances and housing, where rights or entitlements are prescribed by law. They also include planning ahead, for example, making a Lasting Power of Attorney. However, the nature, impact and management of legal needs in the context of end of life care are not known. This study investigated these from the perspectives of patients and carers.

          Methods

          Patients, with estimated prognosis 12 months or less, and carers were recruited from two sites: day services within an urban hospice and primary care in an area of deprivation in North-East England. Semi-structured interviews explored the nature and impact of legal issues, access to appropriate support and unmet needs. Thematic analysis of data was undertaken.

          Results

          Twenty-seven interviews were conducted with 14 patients (10/14 hospice) and 13 carers (7/13 hospice). Five were patient-carer dyads. All participants had experienced problems raising legal issues, which generated significant practical and psychological challenges. All had struggled to access support for social welfare legal issues, describing not knowing what, who, or when to ask for help. All participants accessed some support, however routes, timing and issues addressed were variable. Facilitators included serendipitous triggers and informed healthcare professionals who offered support directly, or signposted elsewhere. A range of professionals and organisations provided support; resolution of issues conferred substantial benefit. The majority of participants identified unresolved legal issues, predominantly related to planning ahead. The challenge of facing increased dependency and death proved a key barrier to this; informed and compassionate healthcare professionals were important enablers.

          Conclusion

          Everyday legal needs are a common and distressing consequence of life-limiting illness, affecting patients and carers alike. This study identified inconsistent approaches but practical and psychological benefit when needs were met. Healthcare professionals were central to meeting social welfare legal needs and facilitating effective planning, with important roles as ‘critical noticers’, trusted intermediaries and compassionate communicators. Increased awareness, clearer pathways to support and closer service integration are needed to meet legal needs as a component of holistic care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.

            Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Planning for tomorrow whilst living for today: the views of people with dementia and their families on advance care planning.

              Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly prominent in many countries; however, the evidence base for its acceptability and effectiveness is limited especially in conditions where cognition is impaired, as in dementia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                colette.hawkins@nhs.net
                Journal
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliative Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-684X
                23 March 2021
                23 March 2021
                2021
                : 20
                : 47
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1006.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley-Clark Building, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, ; Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
                [2 ]Blackhall and Peterlee Practice, Hesleden Road, Blackhall Colliery, County Durham, TS27 4LQ UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, UCL Centre for Access to Justice, UCL Faculty of Laws, ; Bentham House, 4-8 Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.7110.7, ISNI 0000000105559901, Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, , Sunderland University, ; Sunderland, SR1 3SD UK
                [5 ]Palliative Medicine, St Oswald’s Hospice, Regent Avenue, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3 1EE UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.415050.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0641 3308, Present address: Palliative Medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, , Freeman Hospital, ; Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN UK
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-3319
                Article
                739
                10.1186/s12904-021-00739-w
                7989006
                79a2dc80-9108-4ebb-86f6-cbb9e329d812
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 19 November 2020
                : 5 March 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                holistic care,social welfare,legal rights,end of life,advance planning,palliative care

                Comments

                Comment on this article