Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation

Vucetich, John A.; Bruskotter, Jeremy T.; Nelson, Michael Paul

doi:10.1111/cobi.12464

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation : Nature's intrinsic value

Author(s): John A. Vucetich , Jeremy T. Bruskotter , Michael Paul Nelson

Publication date Created: April 2015

Publication date (Print): April 2015

Journal: Conservation Biology

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Related collections

Most cited references 45

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

What Is Conservation Biology?

(1985)

0 comments Cited 331 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Economic reasons for conserving wild nature.

Andrew Balmford, Aaron Bruner, Philip Cooper … (2002)

On the eve of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, it is timely to assess progress over the 10 years since its predecessor in Rio de Janeiro. Loss and degradation of remaining natural habitats has continued largely unabated. However, evidence has been accumulating that such systems generate marked economic benefits, which the available data suggest exceed those obtained from continued habitat conversion. We estimate that the overall benefit:cost ratio of an effective global program for the conservation of remaining wild nature is at least 100:1.