2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Addressing environment, social and governance (ESG) investment in China: Does board composition and financing decision matter?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study examined the link between board composition and environment, social and governance (ESG) investment, and how financing decisions moderate this nexus. The study constructed hypotheses using insights derived from stakeholder and agency theories. We used secondary data from 2010 to 2022 to conduct an empirical analysis using the system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and Fixed Effect (FE) estimators. This study found a positive and significant relationship between board independence, sustainability committee, gender diversity, managerial ownership, board meetings and ESG investment. We also found a negative connection between CEO duality, board size, foreign nationals on the board, annual remuneration, and ESG investment. Furthermore, financing decisions significantly moderated the relationship between board composition and ESG investment. The results confirm the importance of board composition and financing decisions in ESG investment in Chinese manufacturing firms. The results show that splitting the CEO and chairperson roles and frequent board meetings can improve a company's ESG investment. Policymakers should facilitate company operations by providing regulations for ESG investment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tensions in Stakeholder Theory

            A number of tensions have been suggested between stakeholder theory and strategic management (SM). Following a brief review of the histories of stakeholder theory and mainstream SM, we argue that many of the tensions are more apparent than real, representing different narratives about stakeholder theory, SM, business, and ethics. Part of the difference in these two theoretical positions is due to the fact that they seek to solve different problems. However, we suggest how there are areas of overlap, and we argue that some of the tensions may, instead, provide interesting ways to put the two areas of scholarship and practice together. We maintain that SM and stakeholder theory could mutually benefit from a more pragmatist philosophy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                07 May 2024
                30 May 2024
                07 May 2024
                : 10
                : 10
                : e30783
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China
                [b ]School of Business, University of Wollongong, Australia
                [c ]Alma Mater Europaea -ECM, Slovenska ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
                [d ]School of Management, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, 430200, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. School of Business, University of Wollongong, Australia. azakari@ 123456uow.edu.au
                Article
                S2405-8440(24)06814-2 e30783
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30783
                11112284
                38784560
                7975516a-4404-4012-ae5f-9d8973a45acd
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 November 2023
                : 24 April 2024
                : 6 May 2024
                Categories
                Research Article

                board composition,esg investment,financing decisions,manufacturing firms,china

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content446

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors340